An Unusual Growth on the Nipple: Answer.

Tirth R. Patel,B. Kaffenberger,A. Gru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000000433

2017-03-01

American Journal of Dermatopathology

Abstract:DISCUSSION On physical examination, an intraductal papilloma was originally suspected. The histology did not reveal the papillary architecture of a lesion contained within lactiferous ducts, which is typically seen in papillomas. Intraductal papillomas also typically have a layer of cuboidal or columnar epithelial cells overlying a prominent layer of myoepithelial cells. They are associated with increased risk of developing malignant lesions of the breast. Therefore, it is important to exclude this condition from the clinical and histopathologic differential diagnosis, as it could affect treatment and future observation of the patients. A diagnosis of breast carcinoma should also be considered, particularly the histiocytoid or lipid-rich cell variants. Negative staining for cytokeratins in the dermis and the very bland appearance of the histiocytic cells confirmed that this was not a lipidized primary breast neoplasm (eg, lipid-rich carcinoma). Histiocytes with foamy or granular cytoplasm are seen in an uncommon type of breast cancer known as histiocytoid breast carcinoma (HBC). Xanthomatous changes in HBC can be mistaken for more common benign breast lesions. Histiocytoid cells in HBC should stain positive for epithelial markers such as AE1/ AE3 and EMA. HBC should be suspected in a xanthomatous lesion containing pleomorphic mitotically overactive tumor cells or one that has histological features in common with lobular neoplasms or carcinomas of the breast as sometimes those can include an abundance of histiocytic cells. Lesions similar to the one described here are also seen in patients with xanthogranuloma (juvenile xanthogranuloma, JGX). Xanthogranuloma papules characteristically contain lipid-laden CD68+ histiocytes with foamy cytoplasm, as seen in this case. Negative staining for CD1a and S100 confirms the histiocytes in this case are not Langerhans cells, which is consistent with previous descriptions of xanthogranuloma as a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. However, the papules usually contain abundant multinucleated Touton-type giant cells, which were not seen in the current case. Additionally, xanthogranuloma is typically positive for Factor XIIIa (a negative finding in this case). Xanthogranuloma is also most often seen in young children on the head, trunk, or extremities. The lack of S100 staining argues against a diagnosis of granular cell tumor, another entity in the differential diagnosis. Granular cell tumors can rarely present in the nipple. They are also sometimes associated with epidermal changes in the surface (eg, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia), whereas histiocytic lesions are not. A nonneural granular cell tumor is a rare lesion that stains negative for S100. This tumor usually shows cytological atypia with high mitotic activity, neither of which was present in this case. Collections of foamy histiocytes in the papillary dermis and overlying epidermal changes can also raise some consideration of verruciform xanthoma (VX). However, in VX, the dermal infiltrate is typically more superficial, the acanthosis and papillomatosis more prominent, and the lesions are most often in the genital area or oral mucosa. Nonetheless, Lomas-García et al described a case of VX in the breast in association with a lactiferous duct. The description of the so-called “lipophagic polyp” growth on the nipple has been reported previously. A solitary polyp on the nipple has been reported in a 15-year-old girl. Adams et al also described a nursing woman who developed such a polyp on her nipple as a result of a ruptured galactocele in a distal lactiferous duct. Another report demonstrated multiple intraductal polyps suspected to be of similar etiologies. All three cases described lesions that were benign and contained numerous foamy CD68+ histiocytes and no Touton giant cells, very similar to the lesion in our patient. Although our patient was not nursing during the 12-year history of the lipophagic polyp, she may have developed it due to retention mastitis—a condition that can be seen in older women. If the breast acini and ducts are unable to eliminate their secretions, the fluid accumulates, and ductal ectasia can develop. This triggers inflammation, resulting in foamy histiocytes further clogging the duct and forming the lipophagic polyp. Treatments for lipophagic polyps have not been suggested beyond biopsy removal. We remind dermatologists and dermatopathologists to consider a lipophagic polyp for lesions presenting on the nipple. The diagnosis can be readily confirmed through histologic examination. As foam cells can obscure the From the *Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; †Division of Dermatology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; and ‡Department of Pathology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Reprints: Alejandro A. Gru, MD, Division of Dermatopathology, 2012 Kenny Rd., 2nd Floor, Columbus, OH 43214 (e-mail: Alejandro.Gru@ osumc.edu). Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.