Development and validation of a machine learning-based 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT radiomics signature for predicting gastric cancer survival

Huaiqing Zhi,Yilan Xiang,Chenbin Chen,Weiteng Zhang,Jie Lin,Zekan Gao,Qingzheng Shen,Jiancan Shao,Xinxin Yang,Yunjun Yang,Xiaodong Chen,Jingwei Zheng,Mingdong Lu,Bujian Pan,Qiantong Dong,Xian Shen,Chunxue Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00741-4
IF: 5.605
2024-07-30
Cancer Imaging
Abstract:Background: Survival prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC) often influences physicians' choice of their follow-up treatment. This study aimed to develop a positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiomics model combined with clinical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with GC. Methods: We reviewed the clinical information of a total of 327 patients with pathological confirmation of GC undergoing 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) PET scans. The patients were randomly classified into training (n = 229) and validation (n = 98) cohorts. We extracted 171 PET radiomics features from the PET images and determined the PET radiomics scores (RS) using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random survival forest (RSF). A radiomics model, including PET RS and clinical TNM staging, was constructed to predict the OS of patients with GC. This model was evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Results: On multivariate COX regression analysis, the difference between age, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), clinical TNM, and PET RS in GC patients was statistically significant (p < 0.05). A radiomics model was developed based on the results of COX regression. The model had the Harrell's concordance index (C-index) of 0.817 in the training cohort and 0.707 in the validation cohort and performed better than a single clinical model and a model with clinical features combined with clinical TNM staging. Further analyses showed higher PET RS in patients who were older (p < 0.001) and those who had elevated CEA (p < 0.001) and higher clinical TNM (p < 0.001). At different clinical TNM stages, a higher PET RS was associated with a worse survival prognosis. Conclusions: Radiomics models based on PET RS, clinical TNM, and clinical features may provide new tools for predicting OS in patients with GC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?