GAIN2 trial overall survival with intense versus tailored dose dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer

Volker Möbus,Hans-Joachim Lück,Ekkehart Ladda,Peter Klare,Knut Engels,Marcus Schmidt,Andreas Schneeweiss,Eva-Maria Grischke,Grischa Wachsmann,Helmut Forstbauer,Michael Untch,Frederik Marmé,Jens-Uwe Blohmer,Christian Jackisch,Jens Huober,Elmar Stickeler,Mattea Reinisch,Theresa Link,Bruno Sinn,Wolfgang Janni,Carsten Denkert,Sabine Seiler,Christine Solbach,Sabine Schmatloch,Julia Rey,Sibylle Loibl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00675-x
2024-07-30
npj Breast Cancer
Abstract:GAIN-2 trial evaluated the optimal intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk early breast cancer. This study reports the secondary endpoints pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Patients (n = 2887) were randomized 1:1 between idd epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) versus leukocyte nadir-based tailored regimen of dose-dense EC and docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant therapy, with neoadjuvant therapy allowed after amendment. At median follow-up of 6.5 years (overall cohort) and 5.7 years (neoadjuvant cohort, N = 593), both regimens showed comparable 5-year OS rates (iddEnPC 90.8%, dtEC-dtD 90.0%, p = 0.320). In the neoadjuvant setting, iddEnPC yielded a higher pCR rate than dtEC-dtD (51.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.045). Patients achieving pCR had significantly improved 5-year iDFS (88.7% vs. 70.1%, HR 0.33, p < 0.001) and OS rates (93.9% vs. 83.1%, HR 0.32, p < 0.001), but OS outcomes were comparable regardless of pCR status. Thus, iddEnPC demonstrates superior pCR rates compared to dtEC-dtD, yet with comparable survival outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?