Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Frontline insights into care delivery correlate with patients' clinical outcomes. These outcomes might be improved through near-real time identification and mitigation of staff concerns. We evaluated the effects of a prospective frontline surveillance system on patient and team outcomes.DESIGN: Prospective, stepped wedge, non-randomised, cluster controlled trial; prespecified per protocol analysis for high-fidelity intervention delivery.PARTICIPANTS: Seven interdisciplinary medical ward teams from two hospitals in the UK.INTERVENTION: Prospective clinical team surveillance (PCTS): structured daily interdisciplinary briefings to capture staff concerns, with organisational facilitation and feedback.MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was excess length of stay (eLOS): an admission more than 24 hours above the local average for comparable patients. Secondary outcomes included safety and teamwork climates, and incident reporting. Mixed-effects models adjusted for time effects, age, comorbidity, palliation status and ward admissions. Safety and teamwork climates were measured with the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. High-fidelity PCTS delivery comprised high engagement and high briefing frequency.RESULTS: Implementation fidelity was variable, both in briefing frequency (median 80% working days/month, IQR 65%-90%) and engagement (median 70 issues/ward/month, IQR 34-113). 1714/6518 (26.3%) intervention admissions had eLOS versus 1279/4927 (26.0%) control admissions, an absolute risk increase of 0.3%. PCTS increased eLOS in the adjusted intention-to-treat model (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.58, p=0.003). Conversely, high-fidelity PCTS reduced eLOS (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.94, p=0.006). High-fidelity PCTS also increased total, high-yield and non-nurse incident reports (incidence rate ratios 1.28-1.79, all p<0.002). Sustained PCTS significantly improved safety and teamwork climates over time.CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the potential benefits and pitfalls of ward-level interdisciplinary interventions. While these interventions can improve care delivery in complex, fluid environments, the manner of their implementation is paramount. Suboptimal implementation may have an unexpectedly negative impact on performance.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 34806867 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34806867).

Implementation of the TALK© clinical self-debriefing tool in operating theatres: a single-centre interventional study

Evaluation of TALK© training for interprofessional clinical debriefing in Latin America

Impact of a debrief tool in acute child and adolescent mental health inpatient units: a centre’s experience

Use of an electronic documentation module to improve surgical debriefing effectiveness

Effective debriefings in the clinical setting: a pilot study to test the impact of an evidence based debriefing app on anesthesia care providers’ performance

Implementation of an in situ qualitative debriefing tool for resuscitations

The talk debrief experience: Intervention in prehospital personnel care during the Covid-19 pandemic

Remote video auditing with real-time feedback in an academic surgical suite improves safety and efficiency metrics: a cluster randomised study

Implementation of a routine post-shift debriefing program in ICU aiming at quality-of-care improvement: A primary analysis of feasibility and impacts

Using OR Black Box Technology to Determine Quality Improvement Outcomes for In-situ Timeout and Debrief Simulation

[Implementation of the Perioperative WHO Safety Checklist at a Maximum Care Hospital - A Retrospective Analysis]

A ‘paperless’ wall-mounted surgical safety checklist with migrated leadership can improve compliance and team engagement

Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice

Proactive debriefing to promote wellbeing in intensive care nurses: A protocol

Implementing a pre-operative checklist to increase patient safety: a 1-year follow-up of personnel attitudes

Interdisciplinary Simulation Courses to Train Residents on Communication of Unexpected Complications from Perioperative Care: A Randomized Comparison of Within-Event (Microdebriefing) and Postscenario Debriefing

Translating staff experience into organisational improvement: the HEADS-UP stepped wedge, cluster controlled, non-randomised trial

Impact of team performance on the surgical safety checklist on patient outcomes: an operating room black box analysis

Debriefing 101: training faculty to promote learning in simulation-based training

Early Experience of the Peer Advocate Program: Using Quality Improvement to Optimize Behavioral and Communication Disconnect in the Operating Room

Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Debriefing versus Oral Debriefing in Simulation-Based Interdisciplinary Health Professions Education: a randomized trial