Robust and brain-like working memory through short-term synaptic plasticity
Leo Kozachkov,John Tauber,Mikael Lundqvist,Scott L. Brincat,Jean-Jacques Slotine,Earl K. Miller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010776
2022-12-28
PLoS Computational Biology
Abstract:Working memory has long been thought to arise from sustained spiking/attractor dynamics. However, recent work has suggested that short-term synaptic plasticity (STSP) may help maintain attractor states over gaps in time with little or no spiking. To determine if STSP endows additional functional advantages, we trained artificial recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with and without STSP to perform an object working memory task. We found that RNNs with and without STSP were able to maintain memories despite distractors presented in the middle of the memory delay. However, RNNs with STSP showed activity that was similar to that seen in the cortex of a non-human primate (NHP) performing the same task. By contrast, RNNs without STSP showed activity that was less brain-like. Further, RNNs with STSP were more robust to network degradation than RNNs without STSP. These results show that STSP can not only help maintain working memories, it also makes neural networks more robust and brain-like. Working memory has been thought to depend on sustained spiking alone. But recent evidence shows that spiking is often sparse, not sustained. Short-term synaptic plasticity (STSP) could help by maintaining memories between spiking. To test this, we compared artificial recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with and without short-term synaptic plasticity (STSP). Both types of RNNs could maintain working memories. But RNNs with STSP functioned better. They were more robust to network degradation. Plus, their activity that was more brain-like than RNNs without STSP. These results support a role for STSP in working memory.
biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology