Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison
Domenico G Della Rocca,Lorenzo Marcon,Michele Magnocavallo,Roberto Menè,Luigi Pannone,Sanghamitra Mohanty,Vasileios Sousonis,Antonio Sorgente,Alexandre Almorad,Antonio Bisignani,Andrzej Głowniak,Alvise Del Monte,Gezim Bala,Marco Polselli,Sahar Mouram,Vincenzo Fazia La Fazia,Erwin Ströker,Carola Gianni,Sarah Zeriouh,Stefano Bianchi,Juan Sieira,Stephane Combes,Andrea Sarkozy,Pietro Rossi,Serge Boveda,Andrea Natale,Carlo de Asmundis,Gian-Battista Chierchia,Charles Audiat,Giampaolo Vetta,María Cespón-Fernández,Ioannis Doundoulakis,Cinzia Monaco,Ingrid Overeinder,Gregory Carette,Ilenia Lombardo,Kazutaka Nakasone,Ivan Eltzov,Mark La Meir,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae016
2023-12-28
Abstract:Abstract Aims Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel, non-thermal energy source to selectively ablate cardiac tissue. We describe a multicentre experience on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) via the pentaspline FarapulseTM PFA system vs. thermal-based technologies in a propensity score-matched population of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients. Methods and results Propensity score matching was adopted to compare PVI-only ablation outcomes via the FarawaveTM system (Group PFA), cryoballoon (Group CRYO), or focal radiofrequency (Group RF) (PFA:CRYO:RF ratio = 1:2:2). Among 1572 (mean age: 62.4 ± 11.3 years; 42.5% females) PAF patients undergoing first time PVI with either PFA (n = 174), CRYO (n = 655), or RF (n = 743), propensity score matching yielded 174 PFA, 348 CRYO, and 348 RF patients. First-pass isolation was achieved in 98.8% of pulmonary veins (PVs) with PFA, 81.5% with CRYO, and 73.1% with RF (P < 0.001). Procedural and dwell times were significantly shorter with PFA, whereas the availability of a 3D mapping system led to a significant reduction in X-ray exposure with RF. Overall complication rates were 3.4% (n = 6) with PFA, 8.6% (n = 30) with CRYO, and 5.5% (n = 19) with RF (P = 0.052). The 1-year Kaplan–Meier estimated freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 79.3% with PFA, 74.7% with CRYO, and 72.4% with RF (log-rank P-value: 0.24). Among 145 repeat ablation procedures, PV reconnection rate was 19.1% after PFA, 27.5% after CRYO, and 34.8% after RF (P = 0.01). Conclusion Pulsed field ablation contributed to significantly shorter procedural times. Follow-up data showed a similar arrhythmia freedom, although a higher rate of PV reconnection was documented in post-CRYO and post-RF redo procedures.