Quality of life following pelvic exenteration in neoplasms

Renato Morato Zanatto,Samantha Mucci,Rodrigo N Pinheiro,Junea Caris de Oliveira,Ulisses Ribaldo Nicolau,João Paulo Domezi,Dárcia Lima E Silva,Eduardo Marcucci Pracucho,Daniela Ogawa Zanatto,Sarhan Sydney Saad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27760
Abstract:Background: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgical treatment reserved for advanced or recurrent pelvic neoplasms, with potential impacts on patients' quality of life (QoL) poorly referenced in the literature. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate QoL outcomes among three types of PE. Methods: A cross-sectional study assessed 106 patients divided into anterior PE (APE), posterior PE (PPE), or total PE (TPE) groups. QoL was measured using e short form 36 version 2 (SF-36) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) QoL questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential analyses compared questionnaire scores. Results: The findings unveiled a balance among the three groups concerning demographic variables and comorbidities, with the exception of a male predominance in the APE and TPE cohorts. Notably, the APE group exhibited elevated scores in overall health (assessed via SF-36) and social functioning and diarrhea domains (assessed via QLQ-C30). Moreover, in terms of the fatigue and nausea/vomiting domains (assessed via QLQ-C30), the APE group demonstrated superior QoL compared to the PPE group. Conversely, the PPE group manifested a notably lower QoL in the constipation domain (assessed via QLQ-C30) compared to the other two groups. Additionally, disease recurrence was significantly associated with diminished QoL across multiple domains. Conclusion: APE patients exhibited better QoL than PPE and TPE groups, with disease recurrence adversely affecting QoL.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?