Racial Differences in PISQ-12 scores with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence Severity
Jasmin Capellan,Juana Hutchinson-Colas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2024.07.107
IF: 2.739
2024-09-01
Journal of the National Medical Association
Abstract:Purpose To our knowledge, there have been no studies evaluating the association between urinary incontinence and prolapse severity and PISQ-12 scores. Additionally, we analyze racial differences in the PISQ-12 scores. Methods Quality of life questionnaires were completed by patients at their initial urogynecology evaluation, at a specific location of an academic health center. The Institutional Review Board approved this study. ISI scores were calculated and grouped (Dry = 0, Slight = 1-2, Moderate = 3-6, and Severe = 8-12). PFDI-20 questions 3, 16, and 17 were utilized to assess prolapse and incontinence severity. Patients who identified as Black or Hispanic were grouped as 'Person of Color' (POC) and White and Asians as non-POC. Demographics, POC status, PISQ-12 scores, ISI scores, and urinary incontinence severity were analyzed using Pearson's chisquared, ANOVA, and multivariable regression. Results Of the 275 female patients who completed the ISI, PFDI-20, PISQ-12 forms, 250 had urinary incontinence, 93 had any degree of prolapse, and 89 had urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In this cohort, the mean age was 49.7 years and 35.27% identified as POC. PISQ-12 scores were not significantly different between POC and non-POC (p-value = 0.754). PISQ-12 scores tend to increase with prolapse and urinary incontinence severity (p-value 0.037 and 0.001, respectively). Urge incontinence and POC status were significantly associated, with 70% of POC having moderate to severe urge incontinence (p-value 0.012). Conclusion In this cohort, PISQ-12 scores do not significantly differ for POC, while urge incontinence has a statistically significant association with POC status.
medicine, general & internal