Immersive Virtual Reality Use in Medical Intensive Care: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
Brian W Locke,Te-yi Tsai,C Mahony Reategui-Rivera,Aileen S Gabriel,Aref Smiley,Joseph Finkelstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/62842
2024-08-11
JMIR Serious Games
Abstract:Background: Immersive virtual reality (VR) is a promising therapy to improve the experience of patients with critical illness and may help avoid postdischarge functional impairments. However, the determinants of interest and usability may vary locally and reports of uptake in the literature are variable. Objective: The aim of this mixed methods feasibility study was to assess the acceptability and potential utility of immersive VR in critically ill patients at a single institution. Methods: Adults without delirium who were admitted to 1 of 2 intensive care units were offered the opportunity to participate in 5-15 minutes of immersive VR delivered by a VR headset. Patient vital signs, heart rate variability, mood, and pain were assessed before and after the VR experience. Pre-post comparisons were performed using paired 2-sided t tests. A semistructured interview was administered after the VR experience. Patient descriptions of the experience, issues, and potential uses were summarized with thematic analysis. Results: Of the 35 patients offered the chance to participate, 20 (57%) agreed to partake in the immersive VR experience, with no difference in participation rate by age. Improvements were observed in overall mood (mean difference 1.8 points, 95% CI 0.6-3.0; P =.002), anxiety (difference of 1.7 points, 95% CI 0.8-2.7; P =.001), and pain (difference of 1.3 points, 95% CI 0.5-2.1; P =.003) assessed on 1-10 scales. The heart rate changed by a mean of –1.1 (95% CI –0.3 to –1.9; P =.008) beats per minute (bpm) from a baseline of 86.1 (SD 11.8) bpm and heart rate variability, assessed by the stress index (SI), changed by a mean of –5.0 (95% CI –1.5 to –8.5; P =.004) seconds –2 from a baseline SI of 40.0 (SD 23) seconds –2 . Patients commented on the potential for the therapy to address pain, lessen anxiety, and facilitate calmness. Technical challenges were minimal and there were no adverse effects observed. Conclusions: Patient acceptance of immersive VR was high in a mostly medical intensive care population with little prior VR experience. Patients commented on the potential of immersive VR to ameliorate cognitive and emotional symptoms. Investigators can consider integrating minimally modified commercial VR headsets into the existing intensive care unit workflow to further assess VR's efficacy for a variety of endpoints.
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,medical informatics