Abstract:Objective: This study aims to determine the optimal pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) template for radical cystectomy (RC). Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database in December 2021. Articles comparing recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications among patients undergoing limited PLND (lPLND), standard PLND (sPLND), extended PLND (ePLND), or super-extended PLND (sePLND) were included. A Bayesian approach was used for network meta-analysis. Results: We included 18 studies in this systematic review, and 17 studies met our criteria for network meta-analysis. We performed meta-analyses and network meta-analyses to investigate the associations between four PLND templates and the RFS, DSS, OS, or postoperative complications. We found that the ePLND group and the sePLND group were associated with better RFS than the sPLND group (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% Credible Interval [CrI]: 0.56 to 0.78) (HR: 0.67, 95% CrI: 0.56 to 0.83) and the lPLND group (HR: 0.67, 95% CrI: 0.50 to 0.91) (HR: 0.70, 95% CrI: 0.49 to 0.99). For RFS, Analysis of the treatment ranking revealed that ePLND had the highest probabilities to be the best template. There was no significant difference between the four templates in DSS, however, analysis of the treatment ranking indicated that sePLND had the highest probabilities to be the best template. And We found that the sePLND group and the ePLND group were associated with better OS than lPLND (HR: 0.58, 95% CrI: 0.36 to 0.95) (HR: 0.63, 95% CrI: 0.41 to 0.94). For OS, analysis of the treatment ranking revealed that sePLND had the highest probabilities to be the best template. The results of meta-analyses and network meta-analyses showed that postoperative complications rates did not differ significantly between any two templates. Conclusion: Patients undergoing sePLND and ePLND had better RFS but not better DSS or OS than those undergoing lPLND or sPLND templates, however, RFS did not differ between patients undergoing sePLND or ePLND. Considering that sePLND involves longer operation time, higher risk, and greater degree of difficulty than ePLND, and performing sePLND may not result in better prognosis, so it seems that there is no need for seLPND. We think that ePLND might be the optimal PLND template for RC. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022318475.

A propensity-score-matched comparison of standard and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy

Clinical Outcomes of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

A comparative analysis of perioperative complications and biochemical recurrence between standard and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Extended versus non-extended lymphadenectomy during radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of the effect on long-term and short-term outcomes

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Comparison Among Extraperitoneal Single-port and Transperitoneal Multiport Radical Prostatectomy-A Single-center Experience

Comparison Of Perioperative Outcomes In Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy And Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Which lymph node dissection template is optimal for radical cystectomy? A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Do Patients Benefit More from Robot Assisted Approach Than Conventional Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy? A Meta-Analysis of Perioperative and Economic Outcomes.

Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis

Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes.

Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies

Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study at two institutions

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-Low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicentre Lateral Node Study in China.

Evaluating the efficacy of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in selected early-stage left-sided pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching study

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic prostatectomy: antegrade versus retrograde technique

Short‐term and Long‐term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle‐low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Lateral Node Study in China

Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate Cancer

A Comparison Of Perioperative Outcome Between Robot-Assisted And Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience Of A Single Institution

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes after Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score-Matching Study