Cardioneuroablation in Patients with Vasovagal Syncope:An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Alonzo Prata,Eric Katsuyama,Pedro Scardini,Vanio Antunes,João Granja,Ana Carolina Coan,Christian Fukunaga,Juan Carlos Pachón
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.103
IF: 6.779
2024-07-25
Heart Rhythm
Abstract:Background: Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a novel procedure that shows promising results in reducing syncope recurrence in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, its effectiveness and safety remain controversial. Objective: We conducted an updated meta-analysis evaluating CNA efficacy and safety in patients with refractory VVS. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for CNA studies in refractory VVS patients. Our primary efficacy endpoint was (1) syncope recurrence, and our safety endpoint was (2) periprocedural complications. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for (1) ganglionated plexi(GP) targeting method and (2) GP location of ablation. Results: We included 27 observational studies and one RCT encompassing 1153 patients with refractory VVS who underwent CNA. The median age was 39.6 years, and the follow-up was 21.4 months. The overall weighted rate of syncope recurrence after CNA was 5.94% (95% CI: 3.37 to 9.01; I2 = 64%), and the rate of periprocedural complications was 0.99% (95% CI: 0.14 to 2.33; I2: 0%). Our prespecified subgroup analysis among the GP targeting methods and GP ablation location showed a higher prevalence of syncope recurrence in the electroanatomic mapping subgroup (6.21%; 95% CI 2.93 to 10.28; I2 = 0%) and in the right atrium approach (15.78%; 95% CI 3.61 to 33.14; I2 = 65.2%). Conclusion: This study supports the efficacy and safety of CNA in preventing syncope recurrence in patients with VVS. Furthermore, the EAM method of GP targeting and the RA approach were associated with higher syncope recurrence rate than other methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?