Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Detectable Prostate Bed Recurrence after Prostatectomy in RT-Naïve Patients

Riccardo Santamaria,Mattia Zaffaroni,Maria Giulia Vincini,Lorenzo Colombi,Aurora Gaeta,Federico Mastroleo,Giulia Corrao,Dario Zerini,Riccardo Villa,Giovanni Carlo Mazzola,Sarah Alessi,Stefano Luzzago,Francesco Alessandro Mistretta,Gennaro Musi,Ottavio De Cobelli,Sara Gandini,Lukasz Kuncman,Federica Cattani,Francesco Ceci,Giuseppe Petralia,Giulia Marvaso,Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14070870
2024-07-11
Abstract:Purpose or Objective-The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT on detectable prostate bed recurrence in RT-naïve prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods: Eighty-six patients who underwent SBRT for macroscopic bed recurrence after prostatectomy were retrospectively included. Patients were treated based on mpMRI or choline/PSMA PET. Results: The median time to biochemical relapse (BCR) after RP was 46 months, with a median PSA at restaging of 1.04 ng/mL. Forty-six patients were staged with mpMRI and choline/PSMA PET, while ten and thirty were treated based on PET and MRI only, respectively. Only one late G ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed. With a median BCR follow-up of 14 months, twenty-nine patients experienced a BCR with a median PSA at recurrence of 1.66 ng/mL and a median survival free from the event of 40.1 months. The median time to BCR was 17.9 months. Twenty-seven patients had clinical relapse (CR), with a median CR follow-up of 16.27 months and a median time to CR of 23.0 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 88% and 66%, respectively, while clinical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 92% and 82%, respectively. Regarding local relapses, seven were in the field of treatment, while eight of them were outside the field of treatment. Conclusions: Data showed that SBRT targeting only the macroscopic bed recurrence instead of the whole prostate bed is safe and effective. Additional data and longer follow-ups will provide a clearer indication of the appropriate treatment and staging methodology for these patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?