Abstract:Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis to examine whether numeric decision-making in law is susceptible to the effect of (possibly arbitrary) values present in the decision contexts (anchoring effect) and to investigate which factors might moderate this effect. Hypotheses: We predicted that the presence of numeric anchors would bias legal decision-makers' judgment in the direction of the anchor value. We hypothesized that the effect size of anchoring would be moderated by several variables, which we grouped into three categories: methodological (type of stimuli; type of sample), psychological (standard vs. basic paradigm; anchor value; type of scale on which the participants assessed the target value), and legal (relevance of the anchor; type of the anchor; area of law to which the presented case belonged; presence of any salient numeric values other than the main anchor). Method: Twenty-nine studies (93 effect sizes; N = 8,549) met the inclusion criteria. We divided them into two groups, depending on whether they included a control group, and calculated the overall effect size using a random-effects Model with robust variance estimation. We assessed the influence of moderators using random effects metaregression. Results: The overall effect sizes of anchoring for studies with a control group (z = .27, 95% CI [.21, .33], d = .58, 95% CI [.44, .73]) and without a control group (z = .39, 95% CI [.31, .47], d = .91, 95% CI [.69, 1.12]) were both significant, although we provide some evidence of possible publication bias. We found preliminary evidence of a potential moderating effect of some legally relevant factors, such as legal expertise or the anchor relevance. Conclusions: Existing research indicates anchoring effects exist in legal contexts. The influence of anchors seems to depend on some situational factors, which paves the way for future research on countering the problematic effect in legal settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

A simple explanation of the enhancement or depletion of the enantiomeric excess in the partial sublimation of enantiomerically enriched amino acids.

The Quantum Model of Anchoring Effect in Cognitive Decision Making

An Issue of Public Affairs Management: the Effect of Time Slack and Need for Cognition on Prediction of Task Completion

An Experimental Study on the Influence of the Expenditure of Cognitive Resource on Framing Effect

Anchors As Semantic Primes in Value Construction: an Eeg Study of the Anchoring Effect

Effect of Individual Thinking Styles on Item Selection During Study Time Allocation

Rational Anchoring in Economic Valuations

The effect of student time allocation on academic achievement

Fooling with facts: Quantifying anchoring bias through a large-scale online experiment

Anchoring Bias in Online Voting

The nature of anchor-biased estimates and its application to the wisdom of crowds

Histochemical study of the oxidative enzymes in the olfactory bulb of the rat.

The power of past performance in multidimensional supplier evaluation and supplier selection: Debiasing anchoring bias and its knock-on effects

Influences of Anchored Instruction on Fragmented Learning Outcomes of University Students

Effects of Behavioral Anchors on Peer Evaluation Reliability

Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis.

The effects of anchoring on backers' pledge in reward-based crowdfunding: evidence from Taiwanese market

Navigating time and space: examining the impact of contextual factors and self-regulation strategies on university students' momentary engagement

Study longer or study effectively? Better study strategies can compensate for less study time and predict goal achievement and lower negative affect

Saving for the future? Integrating time orientations into the norm-activation model of utility-saving behavior

The influence of the language style of the anchor on consumers' purchase intention