A review of the toxicity of nanoparticles to Daphnia magna
HU Yi,WANG YanLong,LIN DaoHui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/N972017-00476
2017-01-01
Chinese Science Bulletin
Abstract:With the wide production and usage of nanoparticles, nanotoxicityhas received worldwide researches. As a model organism, Daphniamagna has been extensively used in the nanotoxicity studies.In this review, we overviewed research advance in the toxicity ofnanoparticles to Daphnia magna , including acute toxicity,chronic toxicity, bioaccumulation, and the underlying mechanisms.Nanoparticles have dose-responsive acute toxicity to Daphniamanga and their toxicity is related to types of nanoparticlesand culture media. Smaller nanoparticles generally have higher toxicityto Daphnia manga , presumably due to their easiertransport through cell membranes. Due to polar functional groups andorganic macromolecules are able to change surface properties of nanoparticles,most studies suggest that the acute toxicity of nanoparticles mightbe weakened by surface modification. High concentrations of nanoparticlescan suppress the growth and reproduction of Daphnia manga . Bioaccumulation studies showed that nanoparticles could accumulatein Daphnia magna via water, feeding food, and absorbingthrough the skin. Since the concentration of nanoparticles, exposuretime and cultivation media adopted in the studies varied greatly,the body burden and bioconcentration factor of nanoparticles werelargely different, which makes it hard to compare accumulation capacityof Daphnia manga to different nanoparticles. At highexposure concentrations, accumulation amount of nanoparticles by Daphnia manga could reach µg/mg level. Although thetoxicity mechanisms of nanoparticles to Daphnia manga have not been fully understood, below points are generally usedto explain the toxicity: nanoparticle specific toxic, the releaseof toxic metal ions, and forming toxic complexes with other compounds.Nanoparticles and the release of metal ions can adhere and aggregateonto surfaces of Daphnia manga , causing the physicaldamage, membrane permeability changes, and cell function loss. Theycan also promote the production of the reactive oxygen species (ROS)and free radical, leading to lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylationand DNA damage. In addition, some nanoparticles themselves are nottoxic, but can form complexes with toxic substance. At the end of text, we proposed several future research needs.First, compared with the experimental cultivation media, the physicaland chemical properties of natural waters are obviously different,likely to cause big difference in the toxicity results. Therefore,realistic toxicity in natural waters needs to be studied. Second,the exposure concentrations of nanoparticles in chronic experimentsare much higher than that in the real water environment, and the exposuretime is also not long enough compared with practical condition. Lowerconcentrations and longer exposure time of nanoparticles are of greatsignificance. Third, there is no unified approach in bioaccumulationexperiments, making it difficult to compare and analyze the resultsfrom different labs. A standard test method established for the bioaccumulationtest is thus required. Moreover, nanoparticles can remain in Daphnia magna and transfer to their offspring and otherorganisms though food chains. Hence, it is necessary to study thetransformation, chronic toxicity, intergenerational transfer, andmigration though food chains of nanoparticles. Lastly, up to date,toxicity mechanisms of nanoparticles to Daphnia manga have yet to reach a consensus. Nanoparticle characteristics, thegrowth status of Daphnia magna , culture medium compositions,toxicity experimental method, and many other factors might influencethe judgment of the toxicity mechanisms. In order to better understandthe toxic effects caused by nanoparticles, more researches are supposedto be done to find the impacts of these factors on the toxicity mechanisms.