Abstract:Accessible Summary What is known on the subject? Involuntary detention is a legislative power that allows people to be taken against their will for a mandatory mental health assessment and is known to be a restrictive and traumatizing process for patients. While there is some literature examining police/ambulance and mental health worker co‐response models, the conclusions are mixed as to whether they reduce rates of involuntary detentions in mentally ill people. The Police, Ambulance, Clinician Early Response (PACER) model is an example of a tri‐response mental health crisis response team whose role is to respond and assess people thought to be experiencing a mental health crisis. There is little literature to determine whether PACER tri‐response model reduces incidents of involuntary detention when compared with standard police and/or ambulance responses. What this paper adds to existing knowledge? This paper describes the outcomes of patients assessed by a PACER team, compared with patients who were assessed by police or ambulance. It demonstrates that PACER may reduce unnecessary involuntary detentions through expert mental health assessment for patients coming to emergency services for assistance. It is one of only two published studies examining a tri‐response model. What are the implications for practice? The results of this study may support health and policing policymakers to implement PACER models as a means of reducing involuntary detentions, reducing demand for emergency departments, reducing time spent by emergency services responding to people experiencing mental health crisis and improving outcomes for people with mental illness. Background Involuntary detention is a common method of enforcing mental health assessment and treatment; however, it is associated with poor patient outcomes and high emergency service and hospital demand. Aim To examine the association between (1) Police, Ambulance, Clinician, Early Response (PACER) model, (2) police or (3) ambulance response and rates of involuntary detention of mentally ill people. Methods A retrospective observational study using routine administrative data in an Australian City, over a 12‐month period (2019–2020). Results Over a 12‐month period, 8577 people received crisis mental health intervention in the study setting. We observed an 18% increase in the relative risk of being involuntarily detained by police, and a 640% increase in the relative risk of being detained by ambulance. The PACER team detained 10% of their total presentations, as compared with 12% by police and 74% by ambulance. Involuntary detentions enacted by PACER were more likely to convert to a post‐detention hospitalization (72%), when compared with police (27%) and ambulance (17%). Discussion PACER was associated with lower rates of involuntary detention and higher rates of post‐detention hospitalization when compared to police and ambulance response. Implications for Practice PACER cohort experience more positive outcomes than with police or ambulance cohorts.

Spatial patterns of Mental Health Act apprehensions in Toronto, Canada, 2014-2022

Homicide rates are spatially associated with built environment and socio-economic factors: a study in the neighbourhoods of Toronto, Canada

A Case Study of Toronto Neighborhoods, Canada

Perspectives of people with mental health problems at hot spots: Attitudes and perceptions of safety, crime, and the police

Quantifying the Effect of Socio-Economic Predictors and Built Environment on Mental Health Events in Little Rock, AR

Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health-related hospitalization rate of youth in Canada: an interrupted time series analysis

"The reasons you believe …": An exploratory study of text driven evidence gathering and prediction from first responder records justifying state authorised intervention for mental health episodes

Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada

Evaluating the effects of Toronto's supervised consumption sites on crime: multiple baseline interrupted time series analyses with and without synthetic controls

The association between the Police, Ambulance, Clinician Early Response model and involuntary detentions of people living with mental illness: A retrospective observational study

Mental Health Inequities Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From Three Rounds of a Cross-Sectional Monitoring Survey of Canadian Adults

Geographical distribution and the impact of socio-environmental indicators on incidence of Mpox in Ontario, Canada

Use of mental health care for nonpsychotic conditions by immigrants in different admission classes and by refugees in Ontario, Canada

Comparison of the number of pedestrian and cyclist injuries captured in police data compared with health service utilisation data in Toronto, Canada 2016–2021

Police-reported family violence victimisation or perpetration and mental health-related emergency department presentations: an Australian data-linkage study

The prevalence of mental health and addiction concerns and factors associated with depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional study

Mental health service use among mothers and other birthing parents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada

Temporal and spatial shifts in gun violence, before and after a historic police killing in Minneapolis

Overdose mortality incidence and supervised consumption services in Toronto, Canada: an ecological study and spatial analysis

Associations Between Canada's Cannabis Legalization and Emergency Department Presentations for Transient Cannabis-Induced Psychosis and Schizophrenia Conditions: Ontario and Alberta, 2015–2019

Disparities in spatiotemporal clustering of maternal mental health conditions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic