Subcutaneous cysticercosis and cytological findings

B. Joob,V. Wiwanitkit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_389_17
2017-07-01
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Abstract:I n d I a n J o u r n a l o f P a t h o l o g y a n d M I c r o b I o l o g y ¦ V o l u M e 6 0 ¦ I s s u e 3 ¦ J u l y s e P t e M b e r 2 0 1 7 445 Editor, The publication on “subcutaneous cysticercosis and cytological findings” is very interesting.[1] Bhadani et al. mentioned that “The case discussed here highlights the presence of all the parasitic elements together in a single case, which is a very rare and an amazing finding to get on cytology.”[1] We agree that it is very amazing and how the cytological finding can be derived is more suspicious. The basic possible explanation is there is a pitfall in aspiration. Due to the very small inlet to the needle, it is not possible that the whole parasitic body can be sucked and aspirated in a single aspiration. This might reflect the problem of cytological technique and might be a preanalytical error in specimen collection. Finally, if there is any complication after aspiration and rupturing of the parasitic cyst, it should be further discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?