Response to Pettifor et al. 'Young people's sexual health in South Africa': HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors from a nationally representative household survey.

R. Jewkes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AIDS.0000218569.51015.BC
2006-04-04
Abstract:The attempt to determine the relationship between an HIV/AIDS campaign and HIV prevalence by Pettifor et al. is novel. However the finding that participation in at least one loveLife program produces an adjusted odds ratio of 0.6 in relation to HIV prevalence raises a number of questions. The concept of causal impact by a national HIV prevention intervention requires considerable explanation. In South Africa there are a wide range of national-level HIV/AIDS campaigns and programmes. Many including loveLife have an explicit youth and HIV prevention orientation in their activities. Over and above these national-level interventions there are many other influences on the internalization of knowledge about HIV/AIDS and also the response to HIV prevention by young people. These include provincial and local HIV/ AIDS campaigns and programmes; news items documentaries features and talk shows about HIV/AIDS; knowledge of HIV/AIDS statistics; engagement with local HIV/AIDS organizations; discussions as part of faith-based activity; interpersonal communication with family friends health service providers; knowing individuals who are living with HIV or who have died of AIDS and so on. (excerpt)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?