Clinical Test for the Development of New Amalgam Alloys

J. Osborne,E.R. Schlissel,E. N. Gale
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600061701
1981-06-01
Abstract:Since general practitioners spend half their time replacing failed restorations (Going and Jenderson, Dent Clin N Am 16:71, 1971), materials must be developed that have lower failure rates. Some amalgam alloys have a history of a 50% failure rate after eight yr even when exacting restorative procedures are followed (Osborne et al., J Oper Dent 5:24, 1980). The development of high-copper amalgams was stimulated by research (Mahler et al., J Dent Res 52:823, 1973) which showed that restorations made from such alloys have less fracture at the margins. In this study various laboratory tests were evaluated to determine their value in predicting clinical performance. Mahler (op. cit.) related in vitro creep to fracture at the margins of amalgam restorations. Recent data (Osborne et al., J Prosthet Dent 43:622, 1980), however, indicate that creep loses its predictive value if the creep is less than 1%. Because the creep of most high-copper-containing alloys is below this level, this in vitro test cannot be used to differentiate among materials. Unfortunately, not all high-copper amalgams perform better than traditional alloys. Therefore, this poses a serious problem to the development of new amalgams because the alternative to laboratory tests has been long-term clinical trials which are expensive and difficult. An alternative to longterm clinical studies may be short-term clinical studies. To test this hypothesis, 750 restorations made from 12 different alloys were assessed for fracture of the margins at six mo, and the data were compared with the three-year results (Osborne, IADR Progr & Abst 59: No. 339, 1980) from the same group of patients. Interpretation of the six-month clinical data indicates that Dispersalloy had the least fracture at the margins. This alloy was followed by a group of materials which include an experimental high-copper alloy (W5-3), Tytin, Indiloy, Fine Cut, and Velvalloy and was different from Dispersalloy (p < .05). The next alloys were Optaloy II and Sybraloy which overlapped statistically with Fine Cut and Velvalloy from the preceding group and with the following group composed of the three spherical alloys, C. Spher-
What problem does this paper attempt to address?