Comparison of Autonomous AS-OCT Deep Learning Algorithm and Clinical Dry Eye Tests in Diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease
Collin Chase,Amr Elsawy,Taher Eleiwa,Eyup Ozcan,Mohamed Tolba,Mohamed Abou Shousha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S321764
2021-10-22
Clinical Ophthalmology
Abstract:Collin Chase, 1 Amr Elsawy, 2 Taher Eleiwa, 3 Eyup Ozcan, 4 Mohamed Tolba, 2 Mohamed Abou Shousha 2 1 Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; 2 Cornea Department, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt; 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Net Eye Medical Center, Gaziantep, Turkey Correspondence: Mohamed Abou Shousha Cornea Department, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USA Tel +1 305-326-6000 Email Objective: To evaluate a deep learning-based method to autonomously detect dry eye disease (DED) in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images compared to common clinical dry eye tests. Methods: In this study, 27,180 AS-OCT images were prospectively collected from 151 eyes of 91 patients. Images were used to train and test the deep learning model. Masked cornea specialist ophthalmologist diagnoses were used as the gold standard. Clinical dry eye tests were performed on patients in the DED group to compare the results of the model. The dry eye tests performed were tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, corneal staining, conjunctival staining, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: Our deep learning model achieved an accuracy of 84.62%, sensitivity of 86.36%, and specificity of 82.35% in the diagnosis of DED. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.89, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.17. The mean DED probability score was 0.81 ± 0.23 in the DED group and 0.20 ± 0.27 in the healthy group (P < 0.01). The deep learning model accuracy in the diagnosis of DED was significantly better than that of corneal staining, conjunctival staining, and Schirmer's test (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the deep learning diagnostic accuracy and that of the OSDI and TBUT. Conclusion: Based on preliminary results, reliable autonomous diagnosis of DED with our deep learning model was achieved, when compared with standard dry eye clinical tests that correlated significantly more or similarly to diagnoses made by cornea specialist ophthalmologists. Keywords: dry eye disease, artificial intelligence, optical coherence tomography With up to 25% of patients seen in ophthalmic clinics presenting with dry eye disease (DED) related symptoms, it is important to be able to accurately and efficiently diagnose to provide proper treatment to patients. 1–4 Dry eye disease can lead to a decrease in quality of life, as well as, damage to the eye. 5 DED not only matters to the patients affected but also to society when you consider the economic burden of treating DED. The economic burden of DED in the United States has been calculated to cost on average US 55.4 billion annually when including indirect costs and productivity loss. 6 Therefore, the diagnosis of DED has become a major research focus for ophthalmologists considering current diagnostic tests are time-consuming, invasive, unreliable, and poorly associated with patient's symptoms. 4,7–9 The Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II (TFOS DEWS II) concluded that while there is no gold standard for diagnosis of DED, diagnosis should be based on subjects meeting a series of sensitive thresholds for multiple clinical tests with optimal cutoffs that maximize sensitivities and specificities. 10 Current commonly used dry eye diagnostic tests include tear break-up time, ocular surface staining, Schirmer's test, and symptom questionnaires. Other diagnostic tests that are becoming more prevalent in clinic are tear osmolarity, tear film interferometry, ocular surface thermography, and tear film biomarkers. 4,8,11 One of the most common tests performed following the patient's history and thorough slit-lamp examination is the Schirmer's test, which has been shown to be inconsistent, invasive, irritating, and affected by the position of the eye. 4,12 Moreover, besides the difficulty of generating reproducible, accurate results, the cutoff value for an abnormal finding is not definitive, ranging from <5 mm to <10 mm in the literature. 13 With similar problems arising from other dry eye tests commonly administered, it is understandable why dry eye is commonly misdiagnosed and requires further research into diagnostic tools. Another research area that is receiving global attention is the use of artificial intelligence in medicine to improve diagnostic accu -Abstract Truncated-