[Intestinal parasitosis in pregnancy].

R. Piacentino,G. Marchino,F. Zaccheo,L. Ferrara,O. Mazza,D. Ardissone,D. Malara,C. Giobbe,R. Grio,R. Vergano

1991-03-01

Minerva Ginecologica

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Versatility of the supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck reconstruction

Yiyu Ru,Fan Ye,Xiaojing Chen,Jianying Ye,Rongrong Liu,Renyu Lin,Jianfu Chen,Peng Wu,He Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1320

2024-08-12

Abstract:Objective: To present our experience using the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for head and neck reconstruction. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with SCAIF at our institution. The following data were collected: age, sex, surgical indications, flap harvest time, flap dimensions, length of hospital stay, complications, and clinical outcomes. Results: Thirty-three patients underwent SCAIF reconstruction, of whom four underwent pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction simultaneously. Twenty flaps were used to repair pharyngeal or esophageal defects following resection for tonsillar, hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, and cervical esophageal cancers. Five flaps were used for tracheal reconstruction following resection for tracheal or thyroid gland cancer. Seven flaps were used for reconstruction of cervical skin defects or fistulas related to a previous treatment. One flap for tracheal stenosis following tracheotomy. The mean age of the patients was 60.69 ± 11.47 years. The mean flap harvest time was 32.00 ± 4.44 min. The mean flap size was 10.16 ± 3.91 × 5.78 ± 0.68 cm. The mean length of hospital stay is 24.84 ± 13.78 days. Three patients had partial necrosis of the distal portion of the flap, which resolved with anti-infection therapy and local wound care. One patient developed a fistula that was resolved with wound care and further surgical intervention. Complete flap loss or major complications were not observed. No donor site complication or compromised shoulder function was observed. Conclusion: The SCAIF can be successfully used to reconstruct head and neck defects with good outcomes and limited morbidity. Level of evidence: 4.
Choice of Flap and Incidence of Free Flap Success

Stephen S. Kroll,Mark A. Schusterman,Gregory P. Reece,Michael J. Miller,Gregory R. D. Evans,Geoffrey L. Robb,Bonnie J. Baldwin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199609000-00015

1996-09-01

Abstract:A review of 854 consecutive free flaps was performed to determine whether the choice of flap used for the reconstruction influenced the probability of a successful outcome. Flaps were grouped into nine categories: rectus abdominis, free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous, radial forearm, jejunum, latissimus dorsi, fibula, scapula, iliac crest, and other. There were significant differences among the success rates of different flaps (p < 0.0001). Rectus abdominis-based flaps used for breast or head and neck reconstruction had lower failure rates (0.9 percent) than did non-rectus abdominis flaps (6.6 percent; p < 0.0001). Flaps requiring vein grafts had a higher rate of flap loss (18.4 percent) than did flaps that did not require vein grafts (2.9 percent; p < 0.0001). There was a strong trend favoring survival of flaps without a bone component (compared with osteocutaneous flaps), and a weaker trend favoring survival of flaps in nonobese patients (compared with flaps in obese patients). Smoking, age, and previous irradiation had no significant effect on flap failure rates. Surgeons should consider the flap success rate as one (but not necessarily the most important) factor in choosing the best reconstruction for any individual patient.

surgery
Safe and reliable use of supraclavicular flaps for head and neck reconstruction

Hideki Kadota,Yoshie Imai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010483

2024-07-18

Abstract:The supraclavicular flap is a regional flap in the supraclavicular area nourished by the transverse cervical or supraclavicular arteries. This flap gained popularity in the 2000s as it requires less surgical time than free flap reconstruction and has minimal donor-site morbidity. However, a high rate of postoperative complications has been reported. Moreover, there is ongoing debate regarding the indications and limitations of this flap. In this study, we confined the flap design to the supraclavicular fossa, considering flap vascularity and in an effort to minimize donor site morbidity. Between 2014 and 2023, we performed supraclavicular flap reconstruction in 3 cases of cervical skin defects and 1 case of a pharyngeal mucosal defect. The average defect and flap sizes were 7×3.9 cm and 11.5×4.4 cm, respectively. The lower border of the flap remained above the clavicle, and the lateral border did not exceed the acromioclavicular joint. When the flaps were transferred using the transposition method, the angle of transposition was limited to <90 degrees. When the VY advancement or turnover method was selected, we paid attention to the tension-free flap inset. We successfully reconstructed the defects without flap-related complications, and donor site scars were inconspicuous in all patients. In conclusion, we believe that confining the flap design to the supraclavicular fossa, limiting the indications of this flap to the reconstruction of medium-sized defects, and using tension-free flap insets are important for the successful application of this flap.
The versatility of the scapular free flap: A workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Maria J. Escobar‐Domingo,Valeria P. Bustos,Rachel Akintayo,Amir‐Ala Mahmoud,James E. Fanning,Jose A. Foppiani,Amitai S. Miller,Ryan P. Cauley,Samuel J. Lin,Bernard T. Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.31203

2024-06-19

Microsurgery

Abstract:Background The scapular free flap (SFF) is essential in complex reconstructive surgery and often indicated in complex defects with compromised or poor local tissue integrity. This review aims to assess the versatility and reliability of the SFF during reconstruction. Methods A comprehensive literature review of multiple databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. An analysis of pooled data was performed to evaluate flap failure rate for any anatomical unit using SFF as the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included other complication rates after reconstruction such as partial flap loss, revision surgery, fistula, hematoma, and infection. Results A total of 110 articles were included, with 1447 pooled flaps. The main recipient site was the head and neck region (89.0%). Major indications for reconstruction were malignancy (55.3%), burns (19.2%), and trauma (9.3%). The most common types of flaps were osteocutaneous (23.3%), cutaneous (22.6%), and chimeric (18.0%). The pooled flap failure rate was 2% (95%CI: 1%–4%). No significant heterogeneity was present across studies (Q statistic 20.2, p = .69; I2 .00%, p = .685). Nonscapular supplementary flaps and grafts were required in 61 cases. The average length and surface area of bone flaps were 7.2 cm and 24.8cm2, respectively. The average skin paddle area was 134.2cm2. Conclusion The SFF is a useful adjunct in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium as evidence by its intrinsic versatility and diverse clinical indications. Our data suggest a low failure rate in multicomponent defect reconstruction, especially in head and neck surgery. SFFs enable incorporation of multiple tissue types and customizable dimensions—both for vascularized bone and cutaneous skin—augmenting its value in the microsurgeon's repertoire as a chimeric flap. Further research is necessary to overcome the conventional barriers to SFF utilization and to better comprehend the specific scenarios in which the SFF can serve as the preferred alternative workhorse flap.

surgery
Pushing boundaries: Anterolateral thigh free flaps for extensive scalp defects beyond previous limits, leveraging imaging modalities with ultrasound and indocyanine green

Tae Hyung Kim,Jong Woo Choi,Woo Shik Jeong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.31190

2024-06-04

Microsurgery

Abstract:Background Scalp defect reconstruction poses considerable challenges, with ongoing debates regarding the most effective strategies. While the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap has traditionally been favored, the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has been well described as a versatile alternative for addressing extensive scalp defects. This study underscores the success of scalp reconstruction using ALT flaps, notably pushing the boundaries of previously reported flap sizes. Our approach leverages the use of indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion to guide precise preoperative planning and vascular modification, contributing to improved outcomes in challenging cases. Methods We performed 43 ALT flap reconstructions for scalp defects between 2016 and 2023. We collected patients' demographic and clinical data and evaluated flap size and recipient vessels and additional surgical techniques. Detailed preoperative plans with ultrasound and ICG use for intraoperative plans were performed to find perforators location. The cohort was divided into two, with or without complications on flaps, and analyzed depending on its surgical details. Results This study involved 38 patients with extensive scalp defects (mean age: 69.4 ± 11 years) who underwent ALT perforator flap transfers (mean flap size: 230.88 ± 145.6 cm2). There was only one case of unsuccessful flap transfer, and four cases had a few complications. The characteristics of the complication group included a large flap size (303.1 ± 170.9 vs. 214.9 ± 136.6 cm2, P = .211), few perforator numbers without pedicle manipulation, lack of intraoperative indocyanine green administration (75% vs. 25%, P = .607), and the use of superficial temporal vessels as recipient vessels. Conclusions Scalp reconstruction using large ALT free flaps with the aid of imaging modalities facilitates the optimization of surgical techniques, such as pedicle manipulation, perforator numbers, and vein considerations, thereby contributing to successful reconstruction.

surgery
Pedicled Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap Versus Free Radial Forearm Flap for Tongue Reconstruction Following Hemiglossectomy.

Senlin Zhang,Wei Chen,Gang Cao,Zhen Dong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002031

2015-01-01

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract:This study investigated the tongue function and donor-site morbidity of patients with malignant tumors who had undergone immediate flap reconstruction surgery. Twenty-seven patients who had undergone immediate reconstruction after hemiglossectomy were observed. Twelve patients were reconstructed using the pedicled supraclavicular artery island flap (PSAIF) and 15 patients using the free radial forearm flap (FRFF). Flap survival, speech and swallowing function, and donor-site morbidity at the 6-month follow-up were evaluated. All the flaps were successfully transferred. No obvious complications were found in either the transferred flaps or donor regions. Age, sex, defect extent, speech and swallowing function were comparable between the 2 groups. Donor-site complications were less frequent with PSAIF reconstruction than FRFF reconstruction. The PSAIF is reliable and well suited for hemiglossectomy defect. It has few significant complications, and allows preservation of oral function.
[Resistant starches. Part 1. General description and physiologic aspects].

V. P. Iur'ev,M. M. Gapparov,N. Genkina,L. A. Vasserman

Abstract:This paper the recent data related to useful nutritional properties of resistant starches which combine the functional features of food fibers and prebiotics. The low glycaemic index of resistant starches, as well as their specific way of metabolism in gastrointestinal tract resulting in production of short-chain fatty acids in large intestine is discussed. The potential medicinal and prophylactic benefits of resistant starches to some disasters are described. The important value of resistant starches in nutrition.
Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review

Fanny Gabrysz-Forget,Paul Tabet,Akram Rahal,Eric Bissada,Apostolos Christopoulos,Tareck Ayad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0334-y

2019-03-14

Abstract:ObjectiveThe present review focuses on comparative studies of reconstruction with free flaps (FF) versus pedicled flaps (PF) after oncologic resection.MethodA systematic review was developed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines and performed using the Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Amed and Biosis databases.ResultsA total of 30 articles were included. FF are associated with a longer operative time, a higher cost and a higher incidence of postoperative revisions compared to PF. FF are associated with a longer stay at the intensive care unit than the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) and with a more extended hospital stay compared to the submental island flap (SMIF). FF are associated with fewer infections and necrosis compared to the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF).ConclusionThe comparison of both type of flaps is limited by the inherent design of the studies included. In sum, FF seem superior to the PMMF for several outcomes. SMIF and SCAIF compare favorably to FF for some specific indications achieving similar outcomes at a lower cost.
[Clinical Experience with the Supraclavicular Flap to Reconstruct Head and Neck Defects].

Bin Zhang,Dangui Yan,Yabing Zhang,Xiwei Zhang,Hanfeng Wan

2015-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy of pedicled supraclavicular artery island flaps for head and neck reconstruction.METHODS:Reconstructive surgeries for head and neck oncologic defects were performed with the pedicled supraclavicular artery island flaps in 10 patients from May 2013 to December 2014 and the cases were review. Among them, 6 were performed for hypopharyngeal cancer, 2 for oral tongue cancer, 1 for oral base cancer and 1 for cervical esophageal cancer. The size of the flaps was measured in (5-8) cm × (6-12) cm.RESULTS:Seven flaps survived, one flap failured and two flaps had partial necrosis. Donor sites were closed primarily without morbidity.CONCLUSION:The pedicled supraclavicular artery island flap is an easy harvesting and reliable for head and neck reconstruction, especially suitable for otolaryngo-head and neck surgeon and maxillofacial surgeon in the local hospital.
Donor Site Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Free Fibula Flap Versus Deep Circumflex Artery Flap-A Systematic Review

Sanika S Tidke,Pushkar P Waknis,Sneha Setiya,Kunal M Jain,Deeisha Gupta,Samkit Sakhariya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01698-2

Abstract:Introduction: A systematic review of the literature on the donor site morbidity in patients undergoing Maxillofacial reconstruction was performed. The two widely used flaps namely free fibula flap (FFF) and DCIA flap were compared to answer the following questions: (1) Is donor site morbidity significantly different in patients undergoing maxillofacial reconstruction with FFF and DCIA flap? (2) Should donor site morbidity be considered as the criteria for choosing the flap for reconstruction. Materials and methods: The search strategy was based on PRISMA guidelines. Various electronic databases were searched. On reviewing the seven articles included in our systematic review, we found out oral squamous cell carcinoma to be the most common pathology leading to the defects in head and neck region requiring reconstruction with free flaps. Results: A total of 531 participants were investigated who underwent maxillofacial reconstruction using FFF and DCIA flap. The study included both the genders. The participants were assessed for short- and long-term donor site morbidity after the microvascular surgery. Mean age is 45-60 years. Three out of seven studies showed DCIA to have lesser complications at donor site than fibula group. While other two studies proved FFF to be better than DCIA. One study proved low donor site morbidity with regard to both the flap. Conclusion: The free fibula being the flap of choice in head and neck reconstruction has a comparable donor site morbidity to DCIA. The advantages of the iliac artery flap include natural curvature, abundant vertical and horizontal bone height for bone contouring and osseointegration, hidden scar, low incidence of wound healing problems and minimal effect on function and quality of life at long-term follow-up. Thus, it makes it the free flap of choice that one cannot avoid. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021268949).
Indications, Postoperative Outcomes, and Complications of the Lateral Arm Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Edward T C Dong,Jérôme Martineau,Daniel F Kalbermatten,Carlo M Oranges

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006247

2024-10-11

Abstract:Background: The lateral arm free flap (LA-FF) has become an increasingly popular choice in the reconstruction of soft tissue defect in many anatomical regions. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding its safety and efficacy. The aim of this study is to analyze its different applications along with their surgical outcomes. Methods: A systematic review including all studies assessing the surgical outcomes of the LA-FF and proportional meta-analysis using a random-effect DerSimonian-Laird model was performed to assess the postsurgical complications and flap failures. Results: Twenty-five articles were included in the final analysis, representing a total of 1272 flaps in 1256 patients. Indications were mainly defects following tumoral resection and trauma. Across the different studies, the reported flap size range varied from 2 × 4 cm to 12 × 16 cm. The overall pooled flap failure rate across all indications was 3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.04], with a pooled failure rate of 2% (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) in the head and neck region, 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in the upper limb region, and 3% (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) in studies evaluating its use in different anatomical locations. The overall donor site complication rate was 11% (95% CI, 0.03-0.21), with no major complications described. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates safety and efficacy of the LA-FF in reconstructing moderate to large soft tissue defects. It is mainly used for head and neck posttumoral resection and upper and lower limb posttraumatic reconstruction.
FLAP LOSS IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION: IS THERE A SINGULAR CAUSE FOR FAILURE?

Galip Gencay Üstün,Güven Ozan Kaplan,Gökhan Sert,Hakan Uzun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.050

2024-02-01

Abstract:Despite the high success rates reported in head and neck reconstruction, free flap failures continue to persist. Understanding the factors associated with flap loss and improving overall success are paramount. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the factors influencing flap revision and free tissue transfer survival in head and neck reconstruction. The study included 70 patients with defects in the lower two-thirds of the head and neck region and underwent reconstruction using free flaps. Patient age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities and data on the location and aetiology of the defect, the specific type of flap employed, the recipient artery and vein chosen, instances of revision and the overall success of the flap were collected. The investigation aimed to establish correlations between these variables as well as flap success and revision rates. No statistically significant differences were observed in arterial and venous anastomosis revision rates, or flap survival, in relation to variables such as age, gender, flap type, smoking status, comorbidities, recipient artery or vein and the number of vein anastomoses. The malignant tumour group exhibited a lower requirement for arterial revision and a higher flap survival rate compared to the benign tumour group. This study underscores the comparable safety profiles of perforator-based and conventional flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Furthermore, it reveals that patient characteristics are not contraindications for free tissue transfer. Additionally, the quantity of the veins and choice of recipient vessels are flexible and do not significantly impact flap success. The higher rates of flap success in patients with malignant aetiology requires further investigation.

surgery
Predicting and planning for SIEA flap utilisation in breast reconstruction: An algorithm combining pre-operative computed tomography analysis and intra-operative angiosome assessment

Francis P Henry,Daniel P Butler,Simon H Wood,Navid Jallali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.03.011

Abstract:Background: Low flap complication rates and excellent aesthetic outcomes are now commonplace in breast reconstruction. As a result, attention is now being focussed on minimising donor site morbidity. Despite its potential donor site advantages, the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap is often discounted, given concerns about the high flap failure rates. In this study, we present our experience of using the SIEA flap in breast reconstruction and provide an algorithm based on pre-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) to aid pre-operative planning. Methods: A retrospective analysis of SIEA flap breast reconstruction cases performed at our unit between 2009 and 2016 was performed and outcomes were assessed. In addition, the patients' pre-operative CTA images were assessed and compared to those of a matched group of patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Results: Twenty-six patients who underwent SIEA flap breast reconstruction were eligible for inclusion. No flaps were lost. Donor site seroma rate was 20%. The largest SIEA diameter in those who underwent an SIEA flap was significantly larger (p = 0.0001) than in those who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Significantly more number of patients who underwent SIEA flap breast reconstruction had a SIEA diameter greater than or equal to that of the largest DIEP flap perforator (p = 0.0001) in the group where a DIEP flap was used for breast reconstruction. Conclusion: High success rates can be achieved with abdominal flaps based on the superficial vascular system and careful pre- and perioperative assessment of patients.
Donor site morbidity after scapula free flap surgery of head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Sophie McGregor,Katrina Zaraska,Matthew Lynn,Sena Turkdogan,Khanh Linh Tran,Eitan Prisman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27876

2024-07-26

Head & Neck

Abstract:Background The scapula free flap is becoming increasingly more utilized in head and neck reconstruction due to its natural geometry and soft tissue versatility. This study reviews the incidence rate, risk factors, and treatments of complications of scapula donor site morbidity. Methods A review was performed for articles published between October 1990 and November 2022 in Medline (OVID), PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. After screening, 24 articles meeting the criteria were included. Results Overall, 660 head and neck surgeries with the scapula donor bone across 24 studies were included. Twenty studies of 612 scapula free flaps reported a pooled postoperative complication rate of 10.7%, with no major complications. Seven studies of 199 scapula reconstructions showed a mean Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score of 14.39/100. Conclusion With its low rate of morbidity, the scapula flap presents itself as a good alternative for patients at risk for poor healing.

surgery,otorhinolaryngology
The Dieffenbach Flap for Reconstruction of Auricular Defects After Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Amor Niksic,Anne Bennett,Berkay Basagaoglu,Michael E Nissan,James F Thornton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010654

2024-09-16

Abstract:Auricle reconstruction is a challenging problem in plastic surgery due to the ear's prominent location, complex anatomy, and limited local tissue availability. The Dieffenbach flap, a folded postauricular flap, offers a viable flap for reconstruction of larger ear defects. Although the technique has been well defined in previous literature, there are few studies evaluating its outcomes and complications. The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent auricle reconstruction with the Dieffenbach flap by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2022. Data collection included demographics, medical history, cancer type, defect characteristics, postoperative care, outcomes, and complications. Univariable analyses using the Fischer exact test assessed the association between risk factors (smoking, anticoagulation use, and age) and complication rates, with P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 40 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 67.6 and a male prevalence of 77.5%. The mean defect size was 6.5 cm2, with most defects located on the superior helix. The most common complication was postoperative cellulitis (3 patients, 7.5%), followed by contour abnormality that required revision surgery (2 patients, 5.0%). History of smoking had a statistically significant association with complications (P = 0.013). Use of anticoagulants, or older age (defined as >70 years), had no significant association with complication risk. The Dieffenbach flap remains a reliable method for reconstruction of various auricle defects. It is low maintenance, well tolerated by patients, and involves minimal donor site morbidity without the need for cartilage.
Risk Factors for Free Flap Outcomes: A Retrospective Study of 318 Free Flaps for Head and Neck Defect Reconstruction

Qi-hui Qiao,Shou-cheng Yin,Chao Shi,Shuai Wang,Qiang Xu,Zhong-fei Xu,Cui-juan Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613221115143

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objectives This study was conducted to identify the risk factors for free flap outcomes in head and neck reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review of 318 free flaps were used for head and neck reconstructions in 317 patients over seven years. The patient characteristics, surgical data, and flap outcomes were recorded. The impact of risk factors related on the outcomes of free flaps were analyzed using single and multivariate analysis. Results For single factor analysis, 295 free flaps for the first reconstruction were included. Hypertension and the type of recipient vein are associated with venous thrombosis (P = .018, P = .047). Hypertension, type of free flap, recipient artery, and recipient vein were associated with the incidence of re-exploration (P = .009, P = .011, P = .017, P = .021). Hypertension had an obvious effect on the flap survival (P = .005). For multivariate analysis, hypertension (odds ratio = .166, 95% confidence interval: .043 - .636; P = .009) was a statistically significant risk factor for flap survival. For types of recipient artery and vein, selecting two venous anastomosis (one of IJVS and one of EJVS) had the minimum incidence of venous thrombosis (2.2%), and selecting facial artery, single vein (one of IJVS), and two veins (one of IJVS and one of EJVS) for anastomosis had lower incidence of re-exploration, which were 4.4%, 2.9%, and 6.0%, respectively (P < .05). Conclusions Risk factors as hypertension, type of free flap, recipient artery and vein should be paid more attention in the free flaps for head and neck reconstructions. We believe proper measures will lead to better results in head and neck reconstruction.
Use of free flaps for reconstruction in head and neck surgery: a retrospective study of 182 cases

Munenaga Nakamizo,Kazuhiko Yokoshima,Toshiaki Yagi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2004.03.003

IF: 2.119

Auris Nasus Larynx

Abstract:Objective: In order to clarify the factors affecting the survival of flaps, we performed a retrospective study on free flaps (187) used for reconstruction in head and neck surgery in 182 patients. Methods: Free jejunum flaps were used on 68 occasions, rectus abdominus myocutaneous flaps on 67, radial forearm flaps on 49, scapular osteocutaneous flaps on 2 and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap on ones occasion, during the period from May 1996 to April 2003. Post-operative circulatory complications at the recipient site were analyzed mainly in relation to a history of previous surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Results: Circulatory crisis was observed in seven cases and circulation was restored in two of them after emergency exploration, whereas the other five flaps failed to survive. The overall failure rate of free flaps was 2.7%. Wound infection at the recipient site was frequent in patients with a history of previous local cervical surgery. Flap failure was significantly more frequent in patients with a history of previous surgery and infection, except for 2 patients in whose case the microsurgical technique was inadequate. Flap failure was not observed in those patients whose irradiation field could be analyzed, or in the patients who received chemotherapy. Although the incidence of circulatory crisis as a consequence of inadequate microsurgical technique was observed in the early period of this retrospective study, their frequency has diminished in the last 2 years. Conclusion: The survival of flaps was affected by a history of previous surgery following wound infection, although a history of irradiation and chemotherapy would have no effects on flap failure. The appropriate choice of vessels and surgical skill are crucial for the success of free flaps from our experience. Emergency exploration was also crucial for the survival of the flap in the case of circulatory crisis.
Submental island flap versus supraclavicular island flap in oral tongue cancer reconstruction: perioperative and functional outcomes

Hanpon Klibngern,Tapanut Ariyanon,Donyarat Ruenmarkkaew,Sasipim Chaisawad,Pichit Sittitrai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101789

IF: 2.48

2024-01-29

Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract:Background The primary treatment for oral tongue cancer in both early and advanced stages involves surgical resection, which often affects tongue function. When microvascular free flaps are unsuitable for tongue reconstruction following cancer ablation, locoregional pedicled flaps become viable alternatives, for example, submental and supraclavicular island flaps. This study compares perioperative and functional outcomes between submental and supraclavicular flaps in tongue cancer reconstruction. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed the outcomes of 46 patients who underwent tongue resection and reconstruction with a submental or supraclavicular island flap between January 2015 and December 2022. We evaluated patient demographics, flap outcomes, postoperative complications, and speech and swallowing outcomes. Results The study included 24 submental and 22 supraclavicular island flap reconstructions. While demographic data were similar between the two groups, the submental island flap group had significantly shorter operative times than the supraclavicular group (291 and 347 min, respectively, p=0.018), reduced hospital stays (14.8 and 18.6 days, respectively, p=0.016), fewer major recipient site complications necessitating interventions under general anesthesia (1 and 6 patients, respectively, p=0.043), and less recipient wound dehiscence (1 and 8 patients, respectively, p=0.009). Speech and swallowing outcomes were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion The submental island flap appears to be a more favorable option for tongue reconstruction than the supraclavicular island flap, offering advantages in operative time, length of hospital stays, and lower rates of major complications and wound dehiscence.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Intraoperative Complications as Predictors of Flap Failure in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Kerilyn N. Godbe,Erin Rauber,Niaman Nazir,Julie Holding,James A. Butterworth,Eric C. Lai,Katie G. Egan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2434-4661

2024-10-25

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

Abstract:Background Intraoperative microvascular complications in autologous breast reconstruction significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications. No study has identified which specific intraoperative complications contribute to partial or total flap loss. Methods A retrospective chart review of microsurgical breast reconstructions by five surgeons between 2009 and 2020 analyzed operative variables and patient outcomes, with complications determined from the operative report. Flap loss rates were compared between cases with and without intraoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact and t -tests for discrete and continuous variables, respectively. Results Intraoperative complications were analyzed for 1,465 autologous breast flaps performed in 916 patients. Early partial flap loss was predicted by arterial anastomosis revision (2.90 vs. 0.44%, p = 0.03) and alternate venous outflow (14.29 vs. 0.41%, p = 0.002), with no association with intraoperative thrombosis, venous revision, or difficult recipient or flap dissection. In comparison, early total flap loss was predicted by intraoperative arterial revision (5.80 vs. 0.51%, p = 0.001), venous revision (5.45 vs. 0.57%, p = 0.007), intraoperative thrombosis (12.12 vs. 0.49%, p < 0.001), and difficult flap dissection (2.91 vs. 0.59%, p = 0.04). Difficult flap dissection was the only intraoperative variable associated with late partial flap loss (6.80 vs. 1.69%, p = 0.004). Late total flap loss only occurred in 6/1,465 flaps, the sole association being difficult recipient vessel dissection (2.78 vs. 0.29%, p = 0.03). Postoperative arterial and venous compromise occurred in 1.10% (13/1,187) and 2.53% (30/1,187) of cases with no intraoperative complications, respectively, compared with 3.2% (9/278, p = 0.02) and 6.12% (17/278, p = 0.002) in cases with an intraoperative complication. Conclusion Alternate venous outflow predicts early partial flap loss, while intraoperative thrombosis and arterial and venous revision predict early total loss. Difficult flap dissection was associated with early total and late partial flap loss, while difficult recipient vessel dissection was associated with late total flap loss. Received: 14 March 2024 Accepted: 28 August 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 03 October 2024 Article published online: 24 October 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

surgery
Clinical Outcomes and Applicability of Serratus Anterior Muscle Flap With Split Thickness Skin Graft in Thin Resurfacing Reconstructive Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis

Yooseok Ha,Youn Hwan Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004095

2024-11-01

Abstract:This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of the serratus anterior muscle (SAm) free flap combined with a split thickness skin graft (STSG) for thin resurfacing in reconstructive surgery, presenting an alternative to pure skin perforator flaps. It analyzes 14 SAm free flap procedures performed between January 2015 and December 2023. The study cohort comprised 5 women and 9 men, aged 31-80 years, addressing defects caused by infection, malignancy, burn, and trauma, located in various body parts.The study involves harvesting the SAm flap while focusing on anatomical features such as the distinct direction of muscle fibers and the surface location of the vascular pedicle for efficient dissection. It emphasizes the anatomical advantages of the SAm flap, such as robust vascular supply, controlled flap thickness, and preservation of the long thoracic nerve, making it suitable for a range of surgical needs. Complications included STSG loss, partial necrosis, and infection, all managed effectively. Postoperative shoulder function assessment showed no significant impairment.Results demonstrated the successful application of the SAm flap in all cases, with an average flap dimension of 38.21 cm2 and pedicle length of 7.3 cm. The average operation time was 122.1 minutes. The study underscores the SAm flap's adaptability, versatility, and minimal donor site morbidity.It concludes that the SAm flap, in conjunction with STSG, is a viable alternative for thin resurfacing in reconstructive surgery. However, limitations such as the small sample size and procedural variability suggest the need for further research to fully establish the flap's potential in diverse surgical contexts.

[Intestinal parasitosis in pregnancy].

Versatility of the supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck reconstruction

Choice of Flap and Incidence of Free Flap Success

Safe and reliable use of supraclavicular flaps for head and neck reconstruction

The versatility of the scapular free flap: A workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Pushing boundaries: Anterolateral thigh free flaps for extensive scalp defects beyond previous limits, leveraging imaging modalities with ultrasound and indocyanine green

Pedicled Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap Versus Free Radial Forearm Flap for Tongue Reconstruction Following Hemiglossectomy.

[Resistant starches. Part 1. General description and physiologic aspects].

Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review

[Clinical Experience with the Supraclavicular Flap to Reconstruct Head and Neck Defects].

Donor Site Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Free Fibula Flap Versus Deep Circumflex Artery Flap-A Systematic Review

Indications, Postoperative Outcomes, and Complications of the Lateral Arm Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

FLAP LOSS IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION: IS THERE A SINGULAR CAUSE FOR FAILURE?

Predicting and planning for SIEA flap utilisation in breast reconstruction: An algorithm combining pre-operative computed tomography analysis and intra-operative angiosome assessment

Donor site morbidity after scapula free flap surgery of head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The Dieffenbach Flap for Reconstruction of Auricular Defects After Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Risk Factors for Free Flap Outcomes: A Retrospective Study of 318 Free Flaps for Head and Neck Defect Reconstruction

Use of free flaps for reconstruction in head and neck surgery: a retrospective study of 182 cases

Submental island flap versus supraclavicular island flap in oral tongue cancer reconstruction: perioperative and functional outcomes

Intraoperative Complications as Predictors of Flap Failure in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Clinical Outcomes and Applicability of Serratus Anterior Muscle Flap With Split Thickness Skin Graft in Thin Resurfacing Reconstructive Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis