Drivers and evolution of acaricide resistance and multi-resistance in two Ecuador's subtropical livestock farming areas

Ximena Pérez-Otáñez,Valeria Paucar-Quishpe,Claude Saegerman,Jorge Grijalva-Olmedo,Cecilia Pérez-Escalante,Linette Jácome,Carlos Rivera,Darío Cepeda-Bastidas,Susana Arciniegas-Ortega,Sandra Enríquez,Lenin Ron-Garrido,Richar Rodríguez-Hidalgo,Sophie O Vanwambeke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.3471.23969.2
2024-07-24
Abstract:The management of cattle ticks, particularly Rhipicephalus microplus, poses a global challenge in subtropical regions like Ecuador due to its impact on meat and milk productivity, leading to economic losses. Misuse of acaricides has resulted in resistance and multi-resistance, diminishing their effectiveness. This study evaluated resistance to amitraz, alpha-cypermethrin, and ivermectin using the Larval Packet test, laboratory-reared tick larvae collected from cattle were tested. Data on farm management and tick control practices were gathered via a questionnaire in Northwest Pichincha and Quijos River Valley over two years. Resistance rates in the first year (2020-2021) were 67.21% for amitraz, 57.38% for ivermectin, and 67.21% for alpha-cypermethrin. One year later (2021-2022), resistance levels were 59.57% for amitraz, 57.45% for ivermectin, and 68.09% for alpha-cypermethrin, with multi-resistance rates at 67.21% and 65.96% respectively. No significant differences were found between years or locations. Analysis of larval survival data determined lethal doses for tested acaricides. The study emphasizes the association between the lack of acaricide rotation, the incorrect dosage, and the absence of non-chemical measures in tick management could be associated with the development of resistances in ticks. Likewise, this study promotes the need for collaborative efforts to improve control practices and maintain acaricide efficacy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?