Abstract:Introduction: Globally, chronic pain affects more than 30% of people worldwide and is the leading cause of disability and health care utilisation. Access to timely, person-centred, cost-effective programs is unattainable for most. People living in regional, rural and remote areas are disproportionately affected due to scarcity of services and qualified, multidisciplinary health and medical professionals. Caring and supporting people with chronic pain involves a range of interventions that incorporate a multifaceted bio-psychosocial approach. Tertiary and primary chronic pain services are optimally placed to deliver integrated models of care. This pilot study explored the effectiveness of an integrated Guided Self-Help (GSH) program within a multidisciplinary tertiary pain unit in a public hospital in Australia. Methods: A service delivery evaluation was undertaken and a pilot study implemented to determine feasibility and useability of an integrated GSH program for people with chronic pain. A single-group pre-post evaluation was provided to a convenience sample of 42 people referred to the Flinders Medical Centre Pain Management Unit (FMC PMU). Delivered via telehealth or in person by postgraduate students, a manualised GSH workbook was utilised to support adherence and fidelity. Content included goal setting, pain conceptualisation, psychoeducation, activity scheduling, pacing and cognitive strategies. The purpose of the integrated GSH pilot program was to support participants in gaining increased pain literacy, knowledge of effective physical and psychological strategies and enhance self-management of their chronic pain. Levels of psychological distress (PHQ-9 and GAD-7), pain catastrophising (PCS), and pain severity/interference (BPI) were assessed at the beginning and end of support. Integrating the program within a multidisciplinary pain unit intended to facilitate and provide participants with an understanding of their pain through a psychosocial lens, build self-efficacy, and recognise the benefits of other non-medical supports to manage their chronic pain in the future. Outcome data were routinely collected as part of FMC PMU usual practice for clinical and quality assurance purposes, then analysed retrospectively. Thus, under the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Ethical Considerations in Quality Assurance and Evaluation Activities guidelines (NHMRC, 2014), and verified by the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN) Research Committee (our institutional review board) via email (dated 10/09/2020), ethical review and approval were not required for this project as it constituted a quality improvement activity - specifically, a service delivery evaluation. This project is registered with the SALHN Quality Library (for quality assurance activities that are exempt from ethical approval) (Quality Register ID 3390). Results: Participants showed statistically significant improvements on the PHQ-9 [i.e., mean drop of 2.85 (t = 3.16)], GAD [mean drop of 2.52 (t = 2.71)], and PCS [mean drop of 7.77 (t = 3.47)] with small-to-moderate effect sizes. BPI scores did not change. Results were similar when stratifying analyses by those who completed 2-5 versus 6-12 sessions. Conclusion: Integrating a GSH program for people with chronic pain into a multidisciplinary tertiary pain clinic is an efficacious and scalable way to increase access to effective strategies that can increase self-efficacy and self-management. Novel, scalable, and effective solutions are needed to improve quality of life and address disparities for people with chronic pain. The psychological shifts and benefits observed support efficacy towards self-management strategies that can increase autonomy and quality of life.

A Pain in the Pilot

An innovative approach to targeting pain in older people in the acute care setting

Implementing an Evidence-Based Functional Pain Assessment Scale in an Adult Inpatient Unit

Improving Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit by Assessment

Evidence-Based Pain Assessment in Nonverbal Palliative Care Patients

Pilot testing implementation of the pain management clinical practice guideline in nursing homes

Improving analgesia prescription for trauma inpatients

Development and testing of a standardized pain interview assessment for use in post-acute care

Guided Self-Help for People with Chronic Pain: Integrated Care in a Public Tertiary Pain Clinic-A Pilot Study

An Exploration of the Effectiveness of a Peer-Led Pain Management Program (PAP) for Nursing Home Residents with Chronic Pain and an Evaluation of Their Experiences: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Assessing and managing pain during wound dressing change among adult patients in an emergency department: a best practice implementation project

Pain management of adult sedated and ventilated patients in the intensive care units: A survey with free text responses

Pain management interventions of the non‐communicating patient in intensive care: What works for whom and why? A rapid realist review

Preliminary Clinical Testing to Inform Development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam)

Implementing Evidence‐Based Pain Management Interventions Into an Emergency Department: Outcomes Guided by Use of the Ottawa Model of Research Use

A Pilot Interprofessional Education Curriculum for Optimizing Mental Health in Chronic Pain Treatment and Understanding Interprofessional Practice

Can pain be self‐managed? Pain change in vulnerable participants to a health education programme

Nurses' Knowledge and Attitude towards Pain in an Acute Care Setting

Changing Acute Pain Management to Improve Patient Outcomes: an Educational Approach.

Consensus Guidelines for Assessment and Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation in Rural Pain Clinics

Development and usability testing of HEARTPA♀N: protocol for a mixed methods strategy to develop an integrated smartphone and web-based intervention for women with cardiac pain