Abstract:Abstract Background and aims Pain is a multidimensional experience that is difficult to describe and to assess. To scale current pain, assessment refers to a maximum level of pain, but little is known about this process. Further, clinicians tend to underestimate patients’ pain, with or without patients’ own reports, and to underestimate to a greater extent with more clinical experience, possibly due to recalibration of a personal pain scale with increasing exposure to severe pain. We sought to determine how medical students rated pain in early years of clinical exposure, and in relation to experience of their own and others’ worst pains. Methods An online survey sampled medical students’ rating and description of their own worst pain and of that witnessed in another; also what would cause the maximum level of pain and what behaviours characterised it. Last, they indicated their preference among pain scales. Results Thirty-six medical students provided responses, the majority in their first six months of clinical exposure. Students’ own worst pain was rated a mean of 6.7/10 (s.d. 1.6) on a numerical scale; causes were diverse but with many bone fractures. Mean worst pain observed in another was rated 8.6/10 (s.d. 1.4); causes included fractures, gallstones, and sickle cell crises. Another’s worst pain was significantly higher (mean 9.4, s.d. 0.8 vs mean 8.0 s.d. 1.4) when rated after the student’s own pain than before it (presentation order randomised). We found no effect of clinical exposure on estimation of worst pain in another person, nor was there a personal tendency to rate pain using more or less extreme values. Students expected pain of 10/10 to be presented with many verbal, facial and whole body behaviours, and signs of physiological stress. Collectively, behavioural descriptions were rich and varied, but with many incompatibilities: for instance, between ‘writhing’ and ‘rigidity’ expected in the person with extreme pain. Most students preferred the numerical rating scale over visual analogue and verbal scales. Conclusions The study requires replication, particularly for clinical experience, where we found no significant difference in estimation of another’s pain over the first three years of medical students’ clinical exposure, but the comparison was underpowered. Despite no systematic individual difference in using pain ratings, there was a marked effect of rating another’s worst pain higher when the rater had previously rated his/her own worst pain. This suggests anchoring estimate of another’s pain in personal pain experience, and a possible way to mitigate clinicians’ underestimation of patients’ pain. Medical students’ recognition of the importance of facial expression in indicating another’s pain severity was encouraging, but most students anticipated only a narrow range of behaviours associated with extreme pain, thereby excluding other authentic behaviours. Implications Many clinical guidelines mandate regular pain assessment for hospital inpatients, and encourage routine assessment in community and outpatient settings, in order to decide on and monitor treatment. Replication and elaboration of this study could extend our understanding of how clinicians interpret pain scales completed by patients, and how they estimate patients’ pain.

The Relationship Between Patient Perceived Pain and the Numerical Rating System: A Prospective Validation Using Electronic Health Record Data

Description and initial validation of a novel measure of pain intensity: the Numeric Rating Scale of Underlying Pain without concurrent Analgesic use

A Retrospective, Multicenter, Quantitative Analysis of Patients’ Baseline Pain Quality (PROMIS-29) Entering into Pain and Spine Practices in the United States (ALIGN)

Sensory-Discriminative Three-Dimensional Body Pain Mobile App Measures Versus Traditional Pain Measurement With a Visual Analog Scale: Validation Study

Validation of the Calgary Postoperative Pain after Spine Surgery Score for Poor Postoperative Pain Control after Spine Surgery

Using mode and maximum values from the Numeric Rating Scale when evaluating postoperative pain management and recovery

Individualized Numeric Rating Scale to Assess Pain in Critically Ill Children With Neurodevelopmental Disabilities

A comparison of pain registration by Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale, a cross-sectional study of primary triage registration

Electronic Medical Records As a Replacement for Prospective Research Data Collection in Postoperative Pain and Opioid Response Studies

A Novel Methodology to Integrate Outcomes Regarding Perioperative Pain Experience into a Composite Score: Prediction Model Development and Validation.

Moving beyond pain scores: Multidimensional pain assessment is essential for adequate pain management after surgery

Cut-Off Points for Mild, Moderate, and Severe Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Variability and Influence of Sex and Catastrophizing

Mapping PROMIS physical function and pain interference to the modified low back pain disability questionnaire

The Influence of Chronic Pain on Number Sense and Numeric Rating Scale: A prospective Cohort Study

Clinically significant changes in pain along the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale in patients with chronic low back pain

[Retrospective evaluation of electronically recorded patient questionnaires of a university outpatient pain clinic with the painDETECT® questionnaire]

Validation of an Electronic Visual Analog Scale mHealth Tool for Acute Pain Assessment: Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?

Continuous visualization and validation of pain in critically ill patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study

How do medical students use and understand pain rating scales?

A visual analog scale to measure psychological and physical pain: A preliminary validation of the PPP-VAS in two independent samples of depressed patients