Estimation of mosquito-borne and sexual transmission of Zika virus in Australia: Risks to blood transfusion safety
Elvina Viennet,Francesca D. Frentiu,Craig R. Williams,Gina Mincham,Cassie C. Jansen,Brian L. Montgomery,Robert L. P. Flower,Helen M. Faddy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008438
2020-07-14
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Abstract:Since 2015, Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks have occurred in the Americas and the Pacific involving mosquito-borne and sexual transmission. ZIKV has also emerged as a risk to global blood transfusion safety. <em>Aedes aegypti</em>, a mosquito well established in north and some parts of central and southern Queensland, Australia, transmits ZIKV. <em>Aedes albopictus</em>, another potential ZIKV vector, is a threat to mainland Australia. Since these conditions create the potential for local transmission in Australia and a possible uncertainty in the effectiveness of blood donor risk-mitigation programs, we investigated the possible impact of mosquito-borne and sexual transmission of ZIKV in Australia on local blood transfusion safety.We estimated 'best-' and 'worst-' case scenarios of monthly reproduction number (<em>R</em><sub><em>0</em></sub>) for both transmission pathways of ZIKV from 1996–2015 in 11 urban or regional population centres, by varying epidemiological and entomological estimates. We then estimated the attack rate and subsequent number of infectious people to quantify the ZIKV transfusion-transmission risk using the European Up-Front Risk Assessment Tool. For all scenarios and with both vector species <em>R</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> was lower than one for ZIKV transmission. However, a higher risk of a sustained outbreak was estimated for Cairns, Rockhampton, Thursday Island, and theoretically in Darwin during the warmest months of the year. The yearly estimation of the risk of transmitting ZIKV infection by blood transfusion remained low through the study period for all locations, with the highest potential risk estimated in Darwin.Given the increasing demand for plasma products in Australia, the current strategy of restricting donors returning from infectious disease outbreak regions to source plasma collection provides a simple and effective risk management approach. However, if local transmission was suspected in the main urban centres of Australia, potentially facilitated by the geographic range expansion of <em>Ae</em>. <em>aegypti</em> or <em>Ae</em>. <em>albopictus</em>, this mitigation strategy would need urgent review.What if Zika virus (ZIKV) had been introduced in Australia from 1996–2015 in urban centres with established mosquito vectors? Would Australian blood transfusion safety be compromised due to risks associated with ZIKV? In the event of ZIKV introduction into Australia during the period 1996–2015, our estimation shows that local transmission arising from an imported case, would have been possible in most of the selected urban centres, albeit very low. However, ZIKV transmission remained a potential threat in Cairns, Rockhampton, and Thursday Island during the warmest months. Potential geographic range expansion of both <em>Ae</em>. <em>albopictus</em> and <em>Ae</em>. <em>aegypti</em> is a key threat to the Australian mainland. We found that sexual transmission would have an important role in the estimation of <em>R</em><sub><em>0</em></sub> if only the <em>Ae</em>. <em>albopictus</em> population were present and not <em>Ae</em>. <em>aegypti</em>. Had both vectors been established in Australia during the period investigated and a ZIKV introduction occurred, the associated risk to blood transfusion safety would have been low. We identified regions of Australia where ZIKV transmission presents a potential, however low, concern for blood supply safety. Our study informs decision making on blood transfusion safety, public health and mosquito control policies.
tropical medicine,parasitology