ADVANCES IN PHOTORECEPTOR AND RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM QUANTIFICATIONS IN INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: High-Res Versus Standard SPECTRALIS Optical Coherence Tomography

Sophie Frank,Gregor Sebastian Reiter,Oliver Leingang,Philipp Fuchs,Leonard Mana Coulibaly,Virginia Mares,Hrvoje Bogunovic,Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004118
2024-08-01
Retina
Abstract:Purpose: In this study, differences in retinal feature visualization of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices were investigated with different axial resolutions in quantifications of retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors (PRs) in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Methods: Patients were imaged with standard SPECTRALIS HRA + OCT and the investigational High-Res OCT device (both by Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Drusen, retinal pigment epithelium, and PR layers were segmented using validated artificial intelligence-based algorithms followed by manual corrections. Thickness and drusen maps were computed for all patients. Loss and thickness measurements were compared between devices, drusen versus nondrusen areas, and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study subfields using mixed-effects models. Results: Thirty-three eyes from 28 patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration were included. Normalized PR integrity loss was significantly higher with 4.6% for standard OCT compared with 2.5% for High-Res OCT. The central and parafoveal PR integrity loss was larger than the perifoveal loss (P < 0.05). Photoreceptor thickness was increased on High-Res OCT and in nondrusen regions (P < 0.001). Retinal pigment epithelium appeared thicker on standard OCT and above drusen (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Our study shows that High-Res OCT is able to identify the condition of investigated layers in intermediate age-related macular degeneration with higher precision. This improved in vivo imaging technology might promote our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of age-related macular degeneration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?