Tall women with breast cancer have poorer survival than short women

Steven Lehrer,Peter H Rheinstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.08.24310089
2024-07-09
MedRxiv
Abstract:Background: Tall women are more likely to develop breast cancer (BC). High Mobility Group AT-Hook 1(HMGA1), an oncofetal protein, plays a role in the progression of breast cancer. Non-coding sequences proximal to HMGA1 contain variants associated with 4.83 cm taller height. In the current study, we used UK Biobank data to examine the relationship of HMGA1 to height, risk, and prognosis of women with breast cancer. Methods: Our analysis included all subjects with invasive BC that occurred either before or after participant enrollment and were recorded in the UK Biobank database using self-reported data and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD10, ICD9). We divided the subjects into three previously described three height groups: Short (< 155 cm), Medium (155 cm to 175 cm), Tall (> 175 cm). We analyzed the HMGA1 SNP rs41269028, a single nucleotide intron variant, C > T, minor allele frequency 0.044. SNP rs41269028 was previously evaluated in subjects with diabetes. Results: Height of 9583 women with BC homozygous for the HMGA1 SNP rs41269028 major allele was 162.29 cm ± 6.18. Height of 944 women with BC who were carriers or homozygotes (CT + TT) of the minor allele T was 162.88 cm ± 6.001. This difference was significant (p = 0.005). The effect of height group on survival was significant (p = 0.032, log rank test). Tall women had the poorest survival. The effect of HMGA1 SNP rs41269028 genotype on BC risk (p = 0.602) and survival (p = 0.439, log rank test) was insignificant. Conclusion: We conclude that HMGA1 influences height, but we were unable to demonstrate that HMGA1 is related to increased incidence or poor prognosis of tall women with breast cancer. We did find that tall women with breast cancer have poorer survival than short women. Our finding that tall women have a worse prognosis is important because it could help the oncologist decide, along with other prognostic factors, whether adjuvant therapy is warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?