The Diagnostic Advantages of MRI in Cerebral Infarction: Multi-Sequence Imaging and Improved Sensitivity in Early Detection

Taotao Zhao,Jie Huang,Wen Chi
2024-07-19
Abstract:Objective: The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cerebral infarction (CI) in cerebrovascular diseases. Method: 100 patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction (AICI) were divided into a CT group and an MRI group. The diagnostic efficacy of the two diagnostic methods for CI was compared and analyzed. Results: Only 6 patients with acute early stage (AES) CI and 30 patients with acute late stage (ALS) CI were detected by CT, which was significantly less than those detected by MRI (P < .05); 5 patients with <5 mm infarction were detected by CT in ALS and 10 patients with 5-15 mm infarction were detected by CT in ALS, which were significantly less than those detected by MRI (P < .05); 3 patients were diagnosed with cerebral sulcus, fissure, and shallow and disappeared brain cistern, 4 patients with local gyrus swelling, and 31 patients with significant swelling by CT examination, which was significantly less than those detected by MRI (P < .05); the infarct area ratio measured by CT/ diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) was significantly lower than that measured by fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)/DWI (P < .05); the diagnostic specificity (Sp), sensitivity (Se), Youden index, positive predictive value (PV), and negative PV of MRI were 0.82, 0.79, 0.58, 0.7, and 0.88, respectively, which were significantly better than those of CT (P < .05). Conclusion: CT is not a sensitive technique for the diagnosis of early CI. Compared to CT, MRI has the characteristics of multi-sequence and multi-parameter imaging, is more sensitive to infarction within 2 hours after onset, and can more clearly and accurately diagnose CI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?