Abstract:Background: Individuals with developmental language disorder or Williams syndrome are reported to use more gestures than individuals with typical development. However, these two groups differ considerably in visuospatial and language skills, two skills that are hypothesized to shape gesture rate. Aims: We first examined whether children with both developmental language disorder and children Williams syndrome do indeed use more gestures. Our second aim was to disentangle the role of vocabulary and visuospatial skills in the use of supplementary gestures (i.e., containing unique information). To account for participant heterogeneity, analyses included both group comparisons and vocabulary and visuospatial skills at an individual level. As a third aim, the role of visuospatial skills was further examined in relation to gestures containing spatial content. Methods & procedures: In a cross-sectional group design, three participant groups watched and then retold a cartoon: children with typical development (n = 25), children with developmental language disorder (n = 25) and children/young people with Williams syndrome (n = 14). Their narrations were transcribed and hand gestures were coded based on gesture-speech integration (redundant, adds information to particular lexical items, gives information that is entirely absent from speech) and spatial content. Participants' expressive vocabulary and visuospatial skills were measured. Outcomes & results: Between-group comparisons showed that individuals with developmental language disorder or Williams syndrome did indeed use more gestures. Poisson loglinear modelling demonstrated that a relative higher use of supplementary gestures was determined by lower expressive vocabulary skills. Neither the group distinction nor visuospatial skills shaped the supplementary gesture rate nor spatial gesture rate. Conclusions & implications: Regardless of neurodevelopmental condition or typical development, a higher use of supplementary gestures was influenced by expressive vocabulary skills. Children with lower vocabulary skills spontaneously capitalized on the multimodality of communication to express constituents that were not present in their verbal speech. This finding is a promising starting point for future gesture intervention studies examining whether implicit modelling of gesture use can encourage gestures even more in these children and if this allows them to achieve higher linguistic complexity. On a methodological note, the observed intra-group skill variability demonstrates that group comparisons need to be complemented with correlational measures accounting for skills at an individual level. What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject Children with developmental language disorder and children with Williams syndrome are more inclined to use gestures than typically developing children. Research conducted in adults with typical development points towards the role of lexical and visuospatial skills in gesture use, but it is unclear how these skills shape gesture use in children with atypical development. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study compares the rate of gestures that convey meaning that is not expressed in speech between the three aforementioned populations. Novel is the inclusion of the group distinction, individual lexical skills, and visuospatial skills in one encompassing statistical model. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The inclination to use gestures that replace speech is related to lexical skills. Visuospatial skills do not seem to play a role and should not be considered as a factor when thinking about gesture intervention. Understanding how gestures relate to specific skills is a first step to understanding how gesture interventions can bolster language production.

The Development of Gesture Skills in Chinese Autistic Children: The Predictive Roles of Age and Language Ability

The Gestures in 2–4-Year-old Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Do Autistic Children Differ in Language-Mediated Prediction?

A Deficit in Using Prosodic Cues to Understand Communicative Intentions by Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: an Eye-Tracking Study

Does Gestural Communication Influence Later Spoken Language Ability in Minimally Verbal Autistic Children?

The Role of Gesture in Language Development for Neurotypical Children and Children With or at Increased Likelihood of Autism

Predictive Language Processing in Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: an Eye-Tracking Study

Infants who develop autism show smaller inventories of deictic and symbolic gestures at 12 months of age

The cross-racial/ethnic gesture production of young autistic children and their parents

Early gesture development as a predictor of autism spectrum disorder in elevated-likelihood infants of ASD

The influence of child-based factors and parental inputs on expressive language abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder

The Role of Caregiver Gestures and Gesture-Related Responses of Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Early gestural development in high-risk infants and its value on early detection of ASD

Study of Chinese Children's Gesture Development

Task‐related differences in the gesture production of young autistic children

Using a social robot to teach gestural recognition and production in children with autism spectrum disorders

How do minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder use communicative gestures to complement their spoken language abilities?

Show, Give, and Point Gestures Across Infancy Differentially Predict Language Development.

Deliberate synchronization of speech and gesture: effects of neurodiversity and development

Gesture-speech integration is related to vocabulary skills in children with developmental language disorder, Williams syndrome and typical development

A Case Study of Gesture-Based Games in Enhancing the Fine Motor Skills and Recognition of Children with Autism