Abstract:In this paper I seek to unify enactive and ecological approaches to cognitive science by emphasizing the fact that both approaches view cognitive processes as being inherently temporally extended. My hypothesis is that characterizing the temporal scales in which perception of affordances occur, they can serve different purposes of explanation within the theories. Specifically, the paper brings together, on the one hand, Chemero's (2009) dynamicist understanding of affordances, which he called affordances 2.0, with, on the other hand, a distinction originally made by Varela (1999), and later taken up by Shaun Gallagher (2011, 2017b), between three different timescales for understanding cognition: the elementary, the integrative, and the narrative. Varela's three-fold distinction was originally intended as a way of identifying phenomenological events as being causally coupled to specific cellular events happening within the nervous system. The central claim of the present paper is that affordances, likewise, should be understood in terms of these three different timescales. I show that these temporal scales can be a useful toolkit for explaining the perception and learning of affordances and at the same time unifying enactivism and ecological psychology claiming that affordances serve a different explanatory role depending on which time scale you consider them at. If you are interested in explaining the embodied assemblies that form the always changing sensorimotor contingencies, then you see the elementary scale. If you're interested in explaining perception at the integrative scale, then affordances are solicitations that get actualized and bear an umwelt at that same scale. The perception of affordances as such is constituted by the integration of these first two scales, and the experience of it can be characterized by the husserlian structure of experience with its intrinsic temporality. Finally, if you are interested in explaining change in the animal-environment system over developmental time, that is, learning, then affordances are roughly what Chemero proposed and they operate at the narrative scale. But it is important to say that the three scales are always intertwined because learning and perception are ongoing processes that in many senses are impossible to separate. Finally, I discuss the importance of scales from the macro to micro levels for understanding behavior through affordances, considering them as synergies, where abilities and aspects of the environment are understood as constraints on the potential trajectories of such systems.

Human brain dynamics dissociate early perceptual and late motor-related stages of affordance processing

The Virtual Hand Illusion is Moderated by Context-Induced Spatial Reference Frames.

Unveiling interactions of spatial-temporal information in tactile motion perception

Affordance switching in self-organizing brain-body-environment systems

Close interpersonal proximity modulates visuomotor processing of object affordances in shared, social space

Spatial contextual information modulates affordance processing and early electrophysiological markers of scene perception

Neural Correlates of the Embodied Sense of Agency

Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report

Voluntary and Involuntary Dynamics of Perception-Action Processing

Understanding effects of observing affordance-driven action during motor imagery through EEG analysis

Disentangling the neural correlates of agency, ownership and multisensory processing

Building an Affordances Map with Interactive Perception

The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions

Scale Matters: Temporality in the Perception of Affordances

Representation of navigational affordances and ego-motion in the occipital place area

Distinct representation of locomotive action affordances in human behavior, brains and deep neural networks

Learning Environment-Aware Affordance for 3D Articulated Object Manipulation under Occlusions

The Body Knows Better: Sensorimotor signals reveal the interplay between implicit and explicit Sense of Agency in the human mind

Walking-related locomotion is facilitated by the perception of distant targets in the extrapersonal space

Motor Equivalence in Motor Awareness