Association between mixed exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and metabolic syndrome in Korean adults: Data from the Korean National environmental health survey cycle 4

Seung Min Chung,Kyun Hoo Kim,Jun Sung Moon,Kyu Chang Won
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114427
Abstract:Aim: To explore the effect of mixed exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the Korean National Environmental Health Survey Cycle 4 (2018-2020). The serum concentrations of five PFAS (perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA], perfluorooctanesulfonic acid [PFOS], perfluorohexanesulfonic acid, perfluorononanoic acid [PFNA], and perfluorodecanoic acid [PFDeA]) were measured, and the relative potency factor approach was employed for the mixture of PFAS (Cmix) assessment. MetS was diagnosed if the patient satisfied three of five criteria: central obesity, elevated triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated blood pressure (BP), and elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Age, sex, smoking, drinking, and exercise status were considered as covariates. The risk of MetS for single and mixed exposure to PFAS was analyzed using binomial regression and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR). Results: A total of 2984 (male:female = 1:1.3; age range, 19-80 years) adults were enrolled. The prevalence of MetS was 45.6%. Each PFAS and Cmix levels were higher in participants with MetS than in those without MetS. Cmix increased the risk of elevated BP and HbA1c, and eventually MetS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.60 per log10Cmix; OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.07-2.31 in the highest quartile of Cmix [Q4] vs. the lowest [Q1]). Sex-specific analyses revealed that the impact of Cmix was valid in females but not in males (Cmix Q4 vs. Q1: OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.57-1.8 in males; OR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.38-3.84 in females). In the BKMR analysis, mixed exposure to PFAS dose-dependently increased the risk of MetS, particularly in females. Among single exposures, PFNA contributed significantly to the cumulative effect. Conclusion: Mixed exposure to PFAS was associated with a higher risk of MetS in females. Further studies on potential health concerns associated with PFAS mixtures are warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?