Abstract:We assessed patterns of similarity in resource selection across individual elephants linked to crop use, and identified how fragmentation influenced spatial variation in crop selection across the landscape. In areas with low fragmentation, elephants spent less time in crops and selected most strongly for crops further from protected area boundaries, but in areas of high fragmentation, elephants spent twice as much time in crops and selected most strongly for crops closer to the protected area boundary. Our results highlight how individual differences and landscape structure can shape use of agricultural landscapes. To conserve wide‐ranging species in degraded landscapes, it is essential to understand how the behavior of animals changes in relation to the degree and composition of modification. Evidence suggests that large inter‐individual variation exists in the propensity for use of degraded areas and may be driven by both behavioral and landscape factors. The use of cultivated lands by wildlife is of particular interest, given the importance of reducing human‐wildlife conflicts and understanding how such areas can function as biodiversity buffers. African elephant space use can be highly influenced by human activity and the degree to which individuals crop‐raid. We analyzed GPS data from 56 free‐ranging elephants in the Serengeti‐Mara Ecosystem using resource selection functions (RSFs) to assess how crop use may drive patterns of resource selection and space use within a population. We quantified drivers of similarity in resource selection across individuals using proximity analysis of individual RSF coefficients derived from random forest models. We found wide variation in RSF coefficient values between individuals indicating strongly differentiated resource selection strategies. Proximity assessment indicated the degree of crop use in the dry season, individual repeatability, and time spent in unprotected areas drove similarity in resource selection patterns. Crop selection was also spatially structured in relation to agricultural fragmentation. In areas with low fragmentation, elephants spent less time in crops and selected most strongly for crops further from protected area boundaries, but in areas of high fragmentation, elephants spent twice as much time in crops and selected most strongly for crops closer to the protected area boundary. Our results highlight how individual differences and landscape structure can shape use of agricultural landscapes. We discuss our findings in respect to the conservation challenges of human‐elephant conflict and incorporating behavioral variation into human‐wildlife coexistence efforts.

Beyond Crop-Raiding: Unravelling the Broader Impacts of Human-Wildlife Conflict on Rural Communities

Impact of wildlife on food crops and approaches to reducing human wildlife conflict in the protected landscapes of Eastern Nepal

Human Wildlife Conflict and Impacts on Livelihood: A Study in Community Forestry System in Mid-Hills of Nepal

Determining baselines for human-elephant conflict: A matter of time

Prevalence of crop damage and crop-raiding animals in southern Ethiopia: the resolution of the conflict with the farmers

Livestock predation, crop raiding, and community attitudes towards sustainable wildlife conservation in and around Mankira Forest, Southwest Ethiopia

Seasonality, crop type and crop phenology influence crop damage by wildlife herbivores in Africa and Asia

Rural livelihoods, community-based conservation, and human–wildlife conflict: Scope for synergies?

Assessing impacts of human-elephant conflict on human wellbeing: An empirical analysis of communities living with elephants around Maasai Mara National Reserve in Kenya

Crop protection and conflict mitigation: reducing the costs of living alongside non-human primates

A Glance on Human-Wildlife Conflict: Basanta Community Forest of Kailali District

Lack of crucial information exacerbates barriers to mitigating human–elephant conflicts in rural Kenya

Crop use structures resource selection strategies for African elephants in a human‐dominated landscape

GEOSPATIAL ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN-WILDLIFE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS FOR SPATIAL DECISION SUPPORT

Perceived Impacts of Wildlife on Agropastoral Food Production in Northern Tanzania

Taking the Elephants' Perspective: Remembering Elephant Behavior, Cognition and Ecology in Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation

Assessment of Human-Wildlife Conflict and the Attitude of Local Communities to Wild Animal Conservation around Borena Sayint National Park, Ethiopia

Characterization and management of human-wildlife conflicts in mid-hills outside protected areas of Gandaki province, Nepal

What triggered the human-wildlife conflicts in Bangladesh between forest proximity people and wildlife? A responsive study

People in a Biodiverse Region Experienced Varying Types and Timing of Conflict With Multiple Wildlife Species

Human-Elephant Conflict: A Review of Current Management Strategies and Future Directions