Prevalence and risk factors of antenatal depression in the first trimester: A real-world cross-sectional study in a developed district in South China

Junzhe Cheng,Yilin Peng,Jintao Xiong,Xuemei Qin,Zhuo Peng,Weiguo Mao,Huiqin Li,Mi Wang,Li Zhang,Yumeng Ju,Jin Liu,Yan Yu,Bangshan Liu,Yan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.094
2024-10-01
Abstract:Background: Antenatal depression may result in adverse outcomes for both the mother and the offspring. However, few studies have focused on the screening of pregnant women at a higher risk for antenatal depression in the first trimester. The present study aimed to assess the effect of lifestyle and family relationships on antenatal depression in the first trimester in a large Chinese population. Methods: Cross-sectional population data were obtained from a real-world cross-sectional survey conducted in Shenzhen, China from 2020 to 2024. The data on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, and family relationships were obtained using self-reported questionnaires. Antenatal depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), with a score of ≥13 indicating the presence of probable antenatal depression. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors of antenatal depression. Results: A total of 42,363 pregnant women in the first trimester were recruited in the cross-sectional survey, among whom 3107 (7.3 %) had probable antenatal depression. We found (1) age < 25 years, (2) low or moderate economic status, (3) smoking, (4) partner smoking, (5) alcohol use, (6) lack of physical exercise, (7) poor or moderate living environment, (8) low or moderate marital happiness, and (9) never talking about problems were associated with antenatal depression. However, level of education, employment status, partner alcohol use, and living alone were not significantly related to antenatal depression in the first trimester. Limitations: The cross-sectional design and the use of self-report measures must be considered while interpreting the results. Conclusions: This study suggested that the prevalence of antenatal depression in the first trimester was 7.3 %. Public health prevention efforts aimed at reducing the prevalence of antenatal depression are recommended. Early identification of women at a higher risk in early pregnancy is necessary for preventing antenatal depression and improving quality of life.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?