Disruption of relapse to cocaine and morphine seeking by LiCl-induced aversive counterconditioning following memory retrieval

Qian Tang,Zhonghao Li,Fushen Zhang,Lei Han,Weidan Pu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111094
2024-12-20
Abstract:Substance use disorder is conceptualized as a form of maladaptive learning, whereby drug-associated memories, elicited by the presence of stimuli related to drug contexts or cues, contribute to the persistent recurrence of craving and the reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. Hence, use of pharmacology or non-pharmacology way to disrupt drug-related memory holds promise to prevent relapse. Several studies have shown that memories can be unstable and susceptible to modification during the retrieval reactivation phase, termed the "reconsolidation time window". In this study, we use the classical conditioned place preference (CPP) model to investigate the role of aversive counterconditioning on drug-related memories during reconsolidation. Specifically, we uncovered that reconditioning drug cues through counterconditioning with LiCl-induced aversive outcomes following drug memory retrieval reduces subsequent drug-seeking behavior. Notably, the recall of cocaine- or morphine-CPP was eliminated when LiCl-induced aversive counterconditioning was performed 10 min, but not 6 h (outside the reconsolidation time window) after cocaine or morphine memory retrieval. In addition, the effect of LiCl-induced aversive counterconditioning could last for about 14 days. These results suggest that aversive counterconditioning during the reconsolidation of cocaine or morphine memory can prevent the re-seeking of cocaine or morphine, presumably by updating or replacing cocaine or morphine memories with aversive information.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?