Assessment of myocardial microvascular dysfunction in patients with different stages of diabetes mellitus: An adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance study

Xinni Li,Sang Kang,Zhigang Lu,Yuting Liu,Danzengquyang,Huoyuan Xiao,Wenkun Ma,Jingwei Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111600
Abstract:Purpose: To examine myocardial perfusion and T1 mapping indicesin individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at various stages of glycemic control and whether uncontrolled glycemic levels would worsen myocardial microvascular function. Method: Cardiac magnetic resonance examinations were performed on 114 T2DM patients without obstructive coronary artery disease and 55 matched controls. Participants were further divided into four subgroups: Q1 (control); Q2 (prediabetes); Q3 (controlled T2DM) and Q4 (uncontrolled T2DM). The correlation between glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and myocardial perfusion parameters was evaluated. Results: Global myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) was significantly reduced in the Q3 and Q4 subgroups compared to the Q1 or Q2 subgroup (all P<0.001). Compared with the Q1 subgroup, global stress T1 reactivity (stress ΔT1) was significantly reduced in the Q3 and Q4 subgroups (P=0.004 and < 0.001, respectively), but elevated in the Q2 subgroup (P=0.018). Global extracellular volume (ECV) was considerably higher in the Q2 subgroup and gradually rose in the Q3 and Q4 subgroups compared to the Q1 subgroup (P=0.011, 0.001, and 0.007, respectively). HbA1c levels correlated negatively with global MPRI and stress ΔT1, but positively with global ECV (β = -1.993, P<0.001; β = -0.180, P<0.001; and β = 0.127, P<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Global stress ΔT1 reduced in T2DM patients but rose in prediabetes patients. Compared to MPRI, the ECV parameter can indicate diabetes-induced coronary microvascular dysfunction earlier and persists throughout the disorder. Myocardial perfusion and T1 mapping at stress can be used to detect early signs of microvascular dysfunction and subclinical risk factors in patients with T2DM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?