The comparative effects on plaque regrowth of phenolic chlorhexidine and anti-adhesive mouthrinses.

J. Moran,M. Addy,R. Newcombe,P. Warren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-051X.1995.TB01797.X
IF: 7.478
1995-12-01
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Abstract:The inhibition of bacterial attachment to the tooth surface is one possible approach to plaque control. This study evaluated in vivo the plaque inhibitory action of a novel copolymer reported to have considerable antiadhesive properties in vitro. The study was a single blind, 5-treatment, randomised Latin square crossover design, incorporating balance for carry-over effects. The rinses were the antiadhesive (1%), the antiadhesive with 0.02% chlorhexidine, a 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse product, an essential oil/phenolic rinse product and water. 15 volunteers participated and on day 1 of each study period were rendered plaque-free, ceased toothcleaning and rinsed 2 x daily, under supervision, with the allocated formulation. On day 5, plaque was scored by index and area. Washout periods were 2 1/2 days. Alone or combined with chlorhexidine, the antiadhesive agent showed no effects greater than water. The chlorhexidine rinse was significantly more effective than the essential oil/phenolic rinse which in turn was significantly more effective than the other rinses.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?