Multi-Plexus Nonperfusion Area Segmentation in Widefield OCT Angiography Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Yukun Guo,Tristan T Hormel,Min Gao,Qisheng You,Jie Wang,Christina J Flaxel,Steven T Bailey,Thomas S Hwang,Yali Jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.7.15
2024-07-01
Abstract:Purpose: To train and validate a convolutional neural network to segment nonperfusion areas (NPAs) in multiple retinal vascular plexuses on widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 202 participants with a full range of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severities (diabetes mellitus without retinopathy, mild to moderate non-proliferative DR, severe non-proliferative DR, and proliferative DR) and 39 healthy participants. Consecutive 6 × 6-mm OCTA scans at the central macula, optic disc, and temporal region in one eye from 202 participants in a clinical DR study were acquired with a 70-kHz OCT commercial system (RTVue-XR). Widefield OCTA en face images were generated by montaging the scans from these three regions. A projection-resolved OCTA algorithm was applied to remove projection artifacts at the voxel scale. A deep convolutional neural network with a parallel U-Net module was designed to detect NPAs and distinguish signal reduction artifacts from flow deficits in the superficial vascular complex (SVC), intermediate capillary plexus (ICP), and deep capillary plexus (DCP). Expert graders manually labeled NPAs and signal reduction artifacts for the ground truth. Sixfold cross-validation was used to evaluate the proposed algorithm on the entire dataset. Results: The proposed algorithm showed high agreement with the manually delineated ground truth for NPA detection in three retinal vascular plexuses on widefield OCTA (mean ± SD F-score: SVC, 0.84 ± 0.05; ICP, 0.87 ± 0.04; DCP, 0.83 ± 0.07). The extrafoveal avascular area in the DCP showed the best sensitivity for differentiating eyes with diabetes but no retinopathy (77%) from healthy controls and for differentiating DR by severity: DR versus no DR, 77%; referable DR (rDR) versus non-referable DR (nrDR), 79%; vision-threatening DR (vtDR) versus non-vision-threatening DR (nvtDR), 60%. The DCP also showed the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for distinguishing diabetes from healthy controls (96%), DR versus no DR (95%), and rDR versus nrDR (96%). The three-plexus-combined OCTA achieved the best result in differentiating vtDR and nvtDR (81.0%). Conclusions: A deep learning network can accurately segment NPAs in individual retinal vascular plexuses and improve DR diagnostic accuracy. Translational relevance: Using a deep learning method to segment nonperfusion areas in widefield OCTA can potentially improve the diagnostic accuracy of diabetic retinopathy by OCT/OCTA systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?