Biogenic factors explain soil carbon in paired urban and natural ecosystems worldwide
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo,Pablo García-Palacios,Mark A. Bradford,David J. Eldridge,Miguel Berdugo,Tadeo Sáez-Sandino,Yu-Rong Liu,Fernando Alfaro,Sebastian Abades,Adebola R. Bamigboye,Felipe Bastida,José L. Blanco-Pastor,Jorge Duran,Juan J. Gaitan,Javier G. Illán,Tine Grebenc,Thulani P. Makhalanyane,Durgesh Kumar Jaiswal,Tina U. Nahberger,Gabriel F. Peñaloza-Bojacá,Ana Rey,Alexandra Rodríguez,Christina Siebe,Alberto L. Teixido,Wei Sun,Pankaj Trivedi,Jay Prakash Verma,Ling Wang,Jianyong Wang,Tianxue Yang,Eli Zaady,Xiaobing Zhou,Xin-Quan Zhou,César Plaza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01646-z
IF: 30.7
2023-03-28
Nature Climate Change
Abstract:Urban greenspaces support multiple nature-based services, many of which depend on the amount of soil carbon (C). Yet, the environmental drivers of soil C and its sensitivity to warming are still poorly understood globally. Here we use soil samples from 56 paired urban greenspaces and natural ecosystems worldwide and combine soil C concentration and size fractionation measures with metagenomics and warming incubations. We show that surface soils in urban and natural ecosystems sustain similar C concentrations that follow comparable negative relationships with temperature. Plant productivity's contribution to explaining soil C was higher in natural ecosystems, while in urban ecosystems, the soil microbial biomass had the greatest explanatory power. Moreover, the soil microbiome supported a faster C mineralization rate with experimental warming in urban greenspaces compared with natural ecosystems. Consequently, urban management strategies should consider the soil microbiome to maintain soil C and related ecosystem services.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences