Novel Combinations of Immunotherapies or DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors in Platinum-Refractory Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase II BALTIC Study

Niels Reinmuth,Oscar Juan-Vidal,Dariusz Kowalski,Maciej Bryl,Anna Kryzhanivska,David Vicente,Zsolt Horváth,Gabriella Gálffy,Eszter Csánky,Zsolt Pápai Székely,Ihor Vynnychenko,Jon Armstrong,Tapashi Dalvi,Mingchao Xie,Sonia Iyer,Yashaswi Shrestha,Haiyi Jiang,Igor Bondarenko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0013
2024-07-17
Abstract:Purpose: The phase II, multiarm, signal-searching BALTIC study (NCT02937818) assessed novel treatment combinations for platinum-refractory/resistant extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Experimental design: Patients with ES-SCLC with progressive disease during or within 90 days of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received one of three regimens: durvalumab plus tremelimumab followed by durvalumab monotherapy (arm A), adavosertib plus carboplatin (arm B), or ceralasertib plus olaparib (arm C). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses were conducted in arms A and C. Results: In arm A (n=41), arm B (n=10), and arm C (n=21), confirmed ORR was 7.3%, 0%, and 4.8%, respectively. Safety profiles in all arms were consistent with those of the individual drugs. In arm A, patients with PD-L1 expression (tumor cells [TC] or immune cells [IC]) ≥1% appeared to have a greater likelihood of achieving disease control with durvalumab plus tremelimumab than those with PD-L1 (TC and IC) <1%, and lower baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and reduction in on-treatment ctDNA level were both associated with longer overall survival (OS). Among patients treated with ceralasertib plus olaparib in arm C, specific immune response-relevant circulating chemokines and cytokines were identified as early biomarkers of survival and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Conclusions: In BALTIC, all combination regimens demonstrated tolerable safety profiles, but antitumor activity was limited in refractory/resistant ES-SCLC. Among patients treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, an association of on-treatment reduction in ctDNA with longer OS suggests the potential use of ctDNA as a surrogate of treatment response, warranting further investigation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?