Modulation of osteoclastogenesis by macrogeometrically designed hydrophilic dual acid-etched titanium surfaces

Rainde Naiara Rezende de Jesus,Christos Tsatsanis,Camilla Christian Gomes Moura,Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa,Andreas Stavropoulos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0064
2024-07-12
Abstract:The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of implant macrodesign and surface hydrophilicity on osteoclast (OC) differentiation, activation, and survival in vitro. Titanium disks were produced with a sandblasted, dual acid-etched surface, with or without additional chemical modification for increasing hydrophilicity (SAE-HD and SAE, respectively) and different macrodesign comprising trapezoidal (HLX) or triangular threads (TMX). This study evaluated 7 groups in total, 4 of which were experimental: HLX/SAE-HD, HLX-SAE, TMX/SAE-HD, and TMX/SAE; and 3 control groups comprising OC differentiated on polystyrene plates (CCPC): a positive CCPC (+), a negative CCPC (-), and a lipopolysaccharide-stimulated assay positive control group, CCPC-LPS. Murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells were seeded on the disks, differentiated to OC (RAW-OC) by receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) treatment and cultured for 5 days. Osteoclast differentiation and cell viability were respectively assessed by specific enzymatic Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) activity and MTT assays. Expression levels of various OC-related genes were measured at the mRNA level by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). HLX/SAE-HD, TMX/SAE-HD, and HLX/SAE significantly suppressed OC differentiation when compared to CCPC (+). Cell viability was significantly increased in TMX/SAE and reduced in HLX/SAE-HD. In addition, the expression of Interleukin (IL)-6 and Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α was upregulated in TMX/SAE-HD compared to CCPC (+). Hydrophilic surfaces negatively modulate macrophage/osteoclast viability. Specifically, SAE-HD with double triangular threads increases the cellular pro-inflammatory status, while surface hydrophilicity and macrodesign do not seem to have a distinct impact on osteoclast differentiation, activation, or survival.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?