FACTORS AFFECTING INDEPENDENCE OF THE PHYSICALLY DISABLED
E. Bleck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-8749.1990.TB16924.X
1990-03-01
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Abstract:AMONG professional rehabilitationists, there seems to be a debate about which is bestCBR, HBR or CeBR. For those not in the inner circle, these letter codes translate as community-based rehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation and centre-based rehabilitation’. ’. Which reminds me of the witticism attributed to Jerry Brown, former Governor of California: ‘The bureaucrats speak in code and the politicians in cant’. As the result of my experiences in developing a function-oriented approach to the rehabilitation of disabled children and my recent study of the disabled in a small sample of the 600,000 rural villages in India, a broader perspective mi ht be offered to the debate on where rehabilitation should be concentrated. Minaire et a,.’, in their study of an entire village population in France, carefully measured mobility function and demonstrated that environmental factors were important determinants of disability. That independence in mobility is a good marker of independence seems to be the consensus4. My limited but detailed study of disabled people in rural villages in India seemed to confirm Minaire and colleagues’ hypothesis. To my surprise, the children, adolescents and adults with varying degrees of post-poliomyelitis flaccid paralysis and deformities of the lower limbs, cerebral palsy, or spinal and limb deformities due to trauma, had better walking mobility than those I observed in the city. The unpaved village streets had few obstructions to walking-no trucks, buses, autos, mopeds or motorcycles (another benefit Of this was little air or noise pollution). The soft red-dirt surface of the streets provided shock absorption for walking barefoot, at least during the nine-month dry season. The level land in Karnataka State assured minimal energy expenditure in walking, with no hills, steps or stairways to ascend. In contrast, the city had only short segments of sidewalk, so people walked on the edges Of streets congested by motor vehicles-no place for a wheelchair. Disabled children in the city could be mobile only at home or at school, and were dependent on special buses to bring them to and from school. Public buses have an entry step about 15 inches high, in addition to the people being packed like vertical sardines, so appeared to be an insurmountable barrier. Metal calipers were very commonly used by children in the special schools in the city, but no orthotics were used by village people. A knee-ankle-foot orthosis with a locked knee-joint would preclude them from doing village chores, and especially from the customary sitting cross-legged on the floor or squatting to have a bowel movement. Culture and custom affect function, too. Important cultural advantages in the villages seemed to be the cohesion of the extended family, mutual support of fellow villagers and acceptance of the disabled person. There were no ‘special schools’ in the villages, so most of the children, despite limb impairments, were in regular school. The ‘mainstreaming’ of disabled children in the city, I was informed, has been slow and difficult to achieve. The mentally retarded obviously a