Electrocardiographic T Wave:

G. Yan,Jack Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03155.x

2003-06-01

Abstract:Surface ECG waveforms are known to depend on the properties of transmembrane action potentials of cardiomyocytes, the spread of excitation, and the characteristics of the volume conductor, among which the transmembrane action potential is the generator of these waveforms. In other words, any wave on the surface ECG is a manifestation of a potential gradient due to cellular electrical activity within the heart. Obviously, the ECG T wave represents such a potential gradient during ventricular repolarization. The genesis of an upright T wave has been a matter of debate dating back many decades.1,2 An apico-basal voltage gradient, due to a difference in action potential duration (APD) between apical and basal regions, initially was proposed to be responsible for the ECG T wave.1 However, a recent study has demonstrated that the apico-basal voltage gradient contributes little to the T wave on the ECG.3 On the other hand, the concordance of polarity between QRS and T waves, particularly in left precordial leads, suggests that normal ventricular electrical recovery, in contrast to ventricular activation, is from epicardium to endocardium, i.e., a process that generates a transmural voltage gradient.2,4 In the early 1980s, Higuchi and Nakaya4 demonstrated that cooling of canine ventricular epicardial surface, which resulted in prolongation of APD in the epicardium, produced a negative T wave. In contrast, warming of the epicardium, which was associated with APD shortening in the epicardium, led to an upright T wave. They concluded that APD at least 40 to 60 msec longer in the endocardium than in the epicardium was required for the upright T wave.4 However, ionic and cellular basis for the genesis of the positive T wave was not established until the 1990s, when a new subpopulation of cells within ventricular myocardium, i.e., M cells, was discovered by Antzelevitch and colleagues.5 It now is generally accepted that ventricular myocardium is not uniform but rather is composed of at least three electrophysiologically distinct cell types: epicardium, M cells residing at the deep subendocardial layer, and endocardium.5,6 Epicardial, endocardial, and M cells differ primarily from each other by their repolarization properties. The hallmark of M cells is their tendency to have their action potentials prolonged disproportionately to epicardium or endocardium in response to slowing of pacing rate or to drugs that prolong the action potential.3,7-9 The delayed repolarization of M cells and its influence on epicardium and endocardium via