Controlled limb reperfusion in patients with severe limb ischemia.

Y. Sakakibara,T. Mitsui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70349-0

IF: 6.439

1997-02-01

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Clinician and staff experiences with frustrated patients during an electronic health record transition: a qualitative case study

Sherry L. Ball,Bo Kim,Sarah L. Cutrona,Brianne K. Molloy-Paolillo,Ellen Ahlness,Megan Moldestad,George Sayre,Seppo T. Rinne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10974-5

2024-04-28

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:Electronic health record (EHR) transitions are known to be highly disruptive, can drastically impact clinician and staff experiences, and may influence patients' experiences using the electronic patient portal. Clinicians and staff can gain insights into patient experiences and be influenced by what they see and hear from patients. Through the lens of an emergency preparedness framework, we examined clinician and staff reactions to and perceptions of their patients' experiences with the portal during an EHR transition at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

health care sciences & services
Aicardi Syndrome.

R. Young,J. Francis,D. Abramson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.023

Abstract:
Adjusting for differential proportions of second‐line treatment in cancer clinical trials. Part II: An application in a clinical trial of unresectable non‐small‐cell lung cancer

Takuhiro Yamaguchi,Y. Ohashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1817

2004-07-15

Statistics in Medicine

Abstract:The CPT‐11 trial was conducted to confirm the superiority of CDDP+CPT‐11 (CPT‐P) arm to CDDP+VDS (VDS‐P) arm with regard to survival for patients with previously untreated advanced (stage IIIB/IV) non‐small‐cell lung cancer. However, the CPT‐P arm did not show the survival benefit for patients with stage IIIB. The proportion of patients with stage IIIB treated by active radiation given as second‐line treatment (second‐line radiotherapy) after initial (first‐line) treatment was 45 per cent in the CPT‐P arm while 61 per cent in the VDS‐P arm. This showed that not proving survival advantage in the CPT‐P arm might be due to the benefits of second‐line radiotherapy. We apply two causal models appeared in the companion paper to test and estimate the survival differences that would have been observed if all the patients had been received the same second‐line radiotherapy. Based on several assumptions, we inferred that the CPT‐P arm still would not have showed survival advantage if all the patients had been given identical second‐line radiotherapy. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
"Like One Long Battle:" Employee Perspectives of the Simultaneous Impact of COVID-19 and an Electronic Health Record Transition

Justin M Rucci,Sherry Ball,Julian Brunner,Megan Moldestad,Sarah L Cutrona,George Sayre,Seppo Rinne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08284-3

Abstract:Background: Healthcare organizations regularly manage external stressors that threaten patient care, but experiences handling concurrent stressors are not well characterized. Objective: To evaluate the experience of Veterans Affairs (VA) clinicians and staff navigating simultaneous organizational stressors-an electronic health record (EHR) transition and the COVID-19 pandemic-and identify potential strategies to optimize management of co-occurring stressors. Design: Qualitative case study describing employee experiences at VA's initial EHR transition site. Participants: Clinicians, nurses, allied health professionals, and local leaders at VA's initial EHR transition site. Approach: We collected longitudinal qualitative interview data between July 2020 and November 2021 once before and 2-4 times after the date on which the health system transitioned; this timing corresponded with local surges of COVID-19 cases. Interviewers conducted coding and analysis of interview transcripts. For this study, we focused on quotes related to COVID-19 and performed content analysis to describe recurring themes describing the simultaneous impact of COVID-19 and an EHR transition. Key results: We identified five themes related to participants' experiences: (1) efforts to mitigate COVID-19 transmission led to insufficient access to EHR training and support, (2) clinical practice changes in response to the pandemic impacted EHR workflows in unexpected ways, (3) lack of clear communication and inconsistent enforcement of COVID-19 policies intensified pre-existing frustrations with the EHR, (4) managing concurrent organizational stressors increased work dissatisfaction and feelings of burnout, and (5) participants had limited bandwidth to manage competing demands that arose from concurrent organizational stressors. Conclusion: The expected challenges of an EHR transition were compounded by co-occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic, which had negative impacts on clinician experience and patient care. During simultaneous organizational stressors, health care facilities should be prepared to address the complex interplay of two stressors on employee experience.
From "Local Control" to "Dependency": Transitions to Single-Vendor Integrated Electronic Health Record Systems and Their Implications for the EHR Workforce

Julian Brunner,Ekaterina Anderson,David C Mohr,Adena Cohen-Bearak,Seppo T Rinne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08281-6

Abstract:Background: Healthcare systems that previously used either a single legacy electronic health record (EHR) system or a "best-of-breed" combination of products from multiple vendors are increasingly adopting integrated, single-vendor EHR systems. Though healthcare leaders are beginning to recognize the dramatic collateral consequences of these transitions, their impact on the EHR workforce - internal actors most closely involved in governing and supporting the EHR - is poorly understood. Objective: Identify perceived impacts of adopting single-vendor, integrated EHR systems on the institutional EHR workforce. Design: In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews in four healthcare systems in the USA that had adopted an integrated EHR within the previous five years. Participants: Forty-two staff members of four geographically and organizationally diverse healthcare systems, including 22 individuals with formal informatics roles. Approach: Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods. Key results: Across organizations, participants described a loss of autonomy by the EHR workforce at the individual and institutional level following the adoption of an integrated EHR. We also identified references to transformations in four key professional functions of the EHR workforce: communication, governance, optimization, and education. Conclusions: Transitions to integrated EHR systems can have important implications for the autonomy and professional functions of the EHR workforce. These findings may help institutions embarking on similar transitions better anticipate and prepare for these changes through such practices as revising job descriptions, strengthening EHR governance structures, and reinforcing pathways to engage frontline clinicians in supporting the EHR. Findings may also help institutions structure vendor contracts in a way that anticipates and mitigates loss of autonomy.
SBS 0846+513: a new γ-ray-emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy

F. D’Ammando,M. Orienti,J. Finke,C. Raiteri,E. Angelakis,L. Fuhrmann,M. Giroletti,T. Hovatta,W. Max-Moerbeck,J. Perkins,A. Readhead,J. Richards,L. Stawarz,D. Donato

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21707.x

2012-07-12

Abstract:We report Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) observations of the radio-loud active galactic nucleus SBS 0846+513 (z = 0.5835), optically classified as a narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy, together with new and archival radio-to-X-ray data. The source was not active at γ-ray energies during the first two years of Fermi operation. A significant increase in activity was observed during 2010 October–2011 August. In particular, a strong γ-ray flare was observed in 2011 June reaching an isotropic γ-ray luminosity (0.1–300 GeV) of 1.0 × 10^(48) erg s^(−1), comparable to that of the brightest flat spectrum radio quasars, and showing spectral evolution in γ rays. An apparent superluminal velocity of (8.2 ± 1.5)c in the jet was inferred from 2011 to 2012 Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) images, suggesting the presence of a highly relativistic jet. Both the power released by this object during the flaring activity and the apparent superluminal velocity are strong indications of the presence of a relativistic jet as powerful as those of blazars. In addition, variability and spectral properties in radio and γ-ray bands indicate blazar-like behaviour, suggesting that, except for some distinct optical characteristics, SBS 0846+513 could be considered as a young blazar at the low end of the blazar's black hole mass distribution.
Insulin receptor-like tyrosine kinase in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta.

W. Smith,M. Koundinya,T. Mcallister,A. Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6327(1997)35:1/2<99::AID-ARCH9>3.0.CO;2-S

Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology

Abstract:Phosphotyrosine-containing proteins are present in the prothoracic glands, muscle, and fat body of Manduca sexta, as determined by immunoprecipitation followed by kinase assay, and by Western blotting. One such protein (M(r) 178,000) can also be immunoprecipitated using antibodies directed against the human insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate. The 178 kD protein appears to be expressed more strongly in prothoracic glands removed just prior to wandering (days 3-4) and prior to pupation (days 7-9), and phosphorylation of the protein is enhanced by an M. sexta brain factor. The results suggest that a tyrosine-kinase-linked molecule similar to the insulin receptor may play a regulatory role in M. sexta.
The rates and sites of absorption of 131 I-labelled albumin and sodium 131 I in the rat.

R. Parkins,A. Dimitriadou,C. Booth

1960-11-01

Clinical Science

Abstract:
Frontline Perspectives on Physician Burnout and Strategies to Improve Well-Being: Interviews with Physicians and Health System Leaders

Ellis C. Dillon,Ming Tai-Seale,Amy Meehan,Veronique Martin,Robert Nordgren,Tim Lee,Teresa Nauenberg,Dominick L. Frosch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05381-0

IF: 5.7

2019-10-28

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:BackgroundNationally over 50% of physicians report symptoms of burnout.ObjectiveTo understand the perspectives of health system leaders and frontline physicians on contributors to physician burnout and strategies to improve well-being.DesignWe conducted in-depth interviews with health system leaders and frontline physicians at a large, predominantly fee-for-service, multispecialty group practice with approximately 1300 physicians.ParticipantsThe 17 participants included 15 physicians, (12 Internal Medicine and Family Medicine physicians and 3 from other specialties), 11 individuals in leadership roles, and 11 women.ApproachInterviews included a review of factors associated with burnout at the organization, asking participants which factors they believed contributed to burnout, questions about experiences of burnout, and what specific changes would improve well-being.Key ResultsAll 17 participants agreed that organizational factors were key contributors to burnout, while only 9 mentioned the salience of individual factors: "It does not matter how resilient or positive you are, the work environment, especially in primary care will eventually be a problem." An increasing workload associated with the electronic health record (EHR) and a culture focused on productivity were cited as contributing to burnout, especially among physicians in Internal Medicine and Family Medicine (primary care) departments. Physicians in primary care, women, and leaders described multiple barriers to well-being. Participants described responding to increased workloads by reducing clinical work hours. Participants suggested reducing and compensating EHR work, expanding care teams/support staff, reducing use of metrics, providing more support to leaders, changing the business model, and increasing positivity and collegiality, as essential to improving well-being.ConclusionInterviews reveal a variety of interacting factors contributing to physician burnout. Reducing clinical work hours has become a coping strategy. Changes recommended to improve physician well-being include increasing support staff, reducing EHR workload, changing revenue generation and compensation approaches, and shifting organizational culture to place more value on physician wellness.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
Prospective Evaluation of a Closed-Loop, Computerized Reminder System for Pneumococcal Vaccination in the Emergency Department

J. Dexheimer,I. Jones,L. Waitman,T. Talbot,W. Gregg,D. Aronsky

Abstract:The Emergency Department is a suitable but challenging environment to implement a sustainable pneumococcal vaccination program. To increase vaccination rates for patients > or equal to 65 years old, we prospectively evaluated a closed-loop informatics approach over a 6-week study period. Among the 572 candidate patients, 284 were up-to-date with vaccination, 187 patients refused vaccination, 65 physicians declined to order the vaccine, and 28 patients received the vaccine during the ED visit. The informatics approach increased vaccination rate from a baseline of 49.8% to 54.9% (p < 0.01).
Evaluating the Prevalence of Burnout Among Health Care Professionals Related to Electronic Health Record Use: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuxuan Wu,Mingyue Wu,Changyu Wang,Jie Lin,Jialin Liu,Siru Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/54811

2024-06-12

Abstract:Background: Burnout among health care professionals is a significant concern, with detrimental effects on health care service quality and patient outcomes. The use of the electronic health record (EHR) system has been identified as a significant contributor to burnout among health care professionals. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence of burnout among health care professionals associated with the use of the EHR system, thereby providing evidence to improve health information systems and develop strategies to measure and mitigate burnout. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for English-language peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2022. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, and study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing), with EndNote X7 (Clarivate) for reference management. Results: The review included 32 cross-sectional studies and 5 case-control studies with a total of 66,556 participants, mainly physicians and registered nurses. The pooled prevalence of burnout among health care professionals in cross-sectional studies was 40.4% (95% CI 37.5%-43.2%). Case-control studies indicated a higher likelihood of burnout among health care professionals who spent more time on EHR-related tasks outside work (odds ratio 2.43, 95% CI 2.31-2.57). Conclusions: The findings highlight the association between the increased use of the EHR system and burnout among health care professionals. Potential solutions include optimizing EHR systems, implementing automated dictation or note-taking, employing scribes to reduce documentation burden, and leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance EHR system efficiency and reduce the risk of burnout. Trial registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021281173; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021281173.
"Anxiety, COVID, Burnout and Now Depression": a Qualitative Study of Primary Care Clinicians' Perceptions of Burnout

Debora Goetz Goldberg,Tulay Soylu,Carolyn Faith Hoffman,Rachel E Kishton,Peter F Cronholm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08536-2

Abstract:Background: Clinician burnout has become a major issue in the USA, contributing to increased mental health challenges and problems with quality of care, productivity, and retention. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand primary care clinicians' perspectives on burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as their perspectives on the causes of burnout and strategies to improve clinician well-being. Approach: This qualitative research involved in-depth interviews with 27 primary care clinicians practicing in a range of settings across the USA. Semi-structured interviews lasted between 60 and 90 min and were conducted using Zoom video conferencing software between July 2021 and February 2023. Transcripts were analyzed in NVivo software using multiple cycles of coding. Key results: Clinicians shared their experiences with burnout and mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contributors to burnout included high levels of documentation, inefficiencies of electronic health record (EHR) systems, high patient volume, staffing shortages, and expectations for responding to patient emails and telephone calls. The majority of participants described the need to work after clinic hours to complete documentation. Many clinicians also discussed the need for health system leaders to make sincere efforts to enhance work-life balance and create a culture of health and well-being for health professionals. Suggested strategies to address these issues included supportive leadership, accessible mental health services, and additional administrative time to complete documentation. Conclusions: The results of this study provide an in-depth view of participating primary care clinicians' experiences and perceptions of burnout and other mental health challenges. These viewpoints can improve awareness of the issues and strategies to improve the health and well-being of our clinician workforce. Strategies include aligning payment models with the best approaches for delivering quality patient care, reducing administrative burden related to documentation, and redesigning EHR systems with a human factors approach.
Variation in Family Physicians' Experiences Across Different Electronic Health Record Platforms: a Descriptive Study

Nathaniel Hendrix,Andrew Bazemore,A Jay Holmgren,Lisa S Rotenstein,Aimee R Eden,Alex H Krist,Robert L Phillips

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08169-5

Abstract:Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) have been connected to excessive workload and physician burnout. Little is known about variation in physician experience with different EHRs, however. Objective: To analyze variation in reported usability and satisfaction across EHRs. Design: Internet-based survey available between December 2021 and October 2022 integrated into American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) certification process. Participants: ABFM-certified family physicians who use an EHR with at least 50 total responding physicians. Measurements: Self-reported experience of EHR usability and satisfaction. Key results: We analyzed the responses of 3358 physicians who used one of nine EHRs. Epic, athenahealth, and Practice Fusion were rated significantly higher across six measures of usability. Overall, between 10 and 30% reported being very satisfied with their EHR, and another 32 to 40% report being somewhat satisfied. Physicians who use athenahealth or Epic were most likely to be very satisfied, while physicians using Allscripts, Cerner, or Greenway were the least likely to be very satisfied. EHR-specific factors were the greatest overall influence on variation in satisfaction: they explained 48% of variation in the probability of being very satisfied with Epic, 46% with eClinical Works, 14% with athenahealth, and 49% with Cerner. Conclusions: Meaningful differences exist in physician-reported usability and overall satisfaction with EHRs, largely explained by EHR-specific factors. User-centric design and implementation, and robust ongoing evaluation are needed to reduce physician burden and ensure excellent experience with EHRs.
Disrupted and Restored Patient Experience with Transition to New Electronic Health Record System.

Dajun Tian,Christine M. Hoehner,Keith F. Woeltje,Lan Luong,Michael A. Lane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211034064

2021-01-01

Journal of Patient Experience

Abstract:Transitioning from one electronic health record (EHR) system to another is of the most disruptive events in health care and research about its impact on patient experience for inpatient is limited. This study aimed to assess the impact of transitioning EHR on patient experience measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems composites and global items. An interrupted time series study was conducted to evaluate quarter-specific changes in patient experience following implementation of a new EHR at a Midwest health care system during 2017 to 2018. First quarter post-implementation was associated with statistically significant decreases in Communication with Nurses (−1.82; 95% CI, −3.22 to −0.43; P = .0101), Responsiveness of Hospital Staff (−2.73; 95% CI, −4.90 to −0.57; P = .0131), Care Transition (−2.01; 95% CI, −3.96 to −0.07; P = .0426), and Recommend the Hospital (−2.42; 95% CI, −4.36 to −0.49; P = .0142). No statistically significant changes were observed in the transition, second, or third quarters post-implementation. Patient experience scores returned to baseline level after two quarters and the impact from EHR transition appeared to be temporary.
Training physicians and residents for the use of Electronic Health Records-A comparative case study between two hospitals

Susan Humphrey-Murto,Donovan Makus,Sarah Moore,Karen Watanabe Duffy,Jerry Maniate,Katherine Scowcroft,Melanie Buba,J Cristian Rangel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14944

Abstract:Background/purpose: Despite widespread use of Electronic Health Records (EHR), the promise of benefits has not been clearly realised due, in part, to inadequate physician training. Training for EHR use is a highly complex intervention that occurs in a dynamic socio-technical health system. The purpose of this study was to describe and critically assess the interplay between educational activities and organisational factors that influenced EHR training and implementation across two different hospitals. Methods: Based in a socio-technical framework, a comparative qualitative case study was undertaken as well suited to real-world processes. Semi-structured interviews were completed (n = 43), representing administrative leaders, staff physicians, residents and EHR trainers from two Canadian academic hospitals. Thematic analysis was employed for analysis. Results: Similar findings were noted at both hospitals despite different implementation strategies. Despite mandatory training, physicians described limited transferability of training to the workplace. Factors contributing to this included standardised vendor modules (lacking specificity for their clinical context); variable EHR trainer expertise; limited post-launch training; and insufficient preparation for changes to workflow. They described learning while caring for patients and using workarounds. Strong emotional responses were described, including anger, frustration, anxiety and fear of harming patients. Conclusions: Training physicians for effective EHR utilisation requires organisational culture transformation as EHRs impacts all aspects of clinical workflows. Analytic thinking to consider workflows, ongoing post-launch training and the recognition of the interdependency of multiple factors are critical to preparing physicians to provide effective clinical care, and potentially reducing burnout. A list of key considerations is provided for educational leaders.
Strategizing EHR use to achieve patient-centered care in exam rooms: a qualitative study on primary care providers

Jing Zhang,Yunan Chen,Shazia Ashfaq,Kristin Bell,Alan Calvitti,Neil J Farber,Mark T Gabuzda,Barbara Gray,Lin Liu,Steven Rick,Richard L Street,Kai Zheng,Danielle Zuest,Zia Agha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv142

2015-11-13

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract:Abstract Objective Electronic health records (EHRs) have great potential to improve quality of care. However, their use may diminish “patient-centeredness” in exam rooms by distracting the healthcare provider from focusing on direct patient interaction. The authors conducted a qualitative interview study to understand the magnitude of this issue, and the strategies that primary care providers devised to mitigate the unintended adverse effect associated with EHR use. Methods and Materials Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 healthcare providers at 4 Veterans Affairs (VAs) outpatient primary care clinics in San Diego County. Data analysis was performed using the grounded theory approach. Results The results show that providers face demands from both patients and the EHR system. To cope with these demands, and to provide patient-centered care, providers attempt to perform EHR work outside of patient encounters and create templates to streamline documentation work. Providers also attempt to use the EHR to engage patients, establish patient buy-in for EHR use, and multitask between communicating with patients and using the EHR. Discussion and Conclusion This study has uncovered the challenges that primary care providers face in integrating the EHR into their work practice, and the strategies they use to overcome these challenges in order to maintain patient-centered care. These findings illuminate the importance of developing “best” practices to improve patient-centered care in today’s highly “wired” health environment. These findings also show that more user-centered EHR design is needed to improve system usability.

information science & library science,computer science, information systems, interdisciplinary applications,health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study

Daniel R Murphy,Tyler Satterly,Traber D Giardina,Dean F Sittig,Hardeep Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05112-5

Abstract:Background: Workload from electronic health record (EHR) inbox notifications leads to information overload and contributes to job dissatisfaction and physician burnout. Better understanding of physicians' inbox requirements and workflows could optimize inbox designs, enhance efficiency, and reduce safety risks from information overload. Design: We conducted a mixed-methods study to identify strategies to enhance EHR inbox design and workflow. First, we performed a secondary analysis of national survey data of all Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care practitioners (PCP) to identify major themes in responses to a free-text question soliciting suggestions to improve EHR inbox design and workflows. We then conducted expert interviews of clinicians at five health care systems (1 VA and 4 non-VA settings using 4 different EHRs) to understand existing optimal strategies to improve efficiency and situational awareness related to EHR inbox use. Themes from survey data were cross-validated with interview findings. Results: We analyzed responses from 2104 PCPs who completed the free-text inbox question (of 5001 PCPs who responded to survey) and used an inductive approach to identify five themes: (1) Inbox notification content should be actionable for patient care and relevant to recipient clinician, (2) Inboxes should reduce risk of losing messages, (3) Inbox functionality should be optimized to improve efficiency of processing notifications, (4) Team support should be leveraged to help with EHR inbox notification burden, (5) Sufficient time should be provided to all clinicians to process EHR inbox notifications. We subsequently interviewed 15 VA and non-VA clinicians and identified 11 unique strategies, each corresponding directly with one of these five themes. Conclusion: Feedback from practicing end-user clinicians provides robust evidence to improve content and design of the EHR inbox and related clinical workflows and organizational policies. Several strategies we identified could improve clinicians' EHR efficiency and satisfaction as well as empower them to work with their local administrators, health IT personnel, and EHR developers to improve these systems.
A Qualitative Study of Well-Being and Workplace Stress

Maria Provenzano,Nicola Cillara,Felice Curcio,Maria Orsola Pisu,Cesar Iván Avilés González,Maria Francisca Jiménez-Herrera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111430

IF: 4.614

2024-10-29

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Adopting electronic health records (EHRs) offers improved communication and information sharing and reduces medical staff errors. Despite these potential benefits, EHR adoption often introduces new challenges for healthcare staff, including increased administrative burdens and workplace stress. This study examines the impact of EHR systems on the well-being and workplace stress of healthcare staff in a hospital setting. Using a qualitative multi-perspective research approach, 16 guideline-based interviews were conducted to explore experiences, insight, and perceptions surrounding the anticipated introduction of EHRs. Data analysis reveals a complex interplay between the perceived advantages of EHRs, such as improved data accessibility and patient safety, and the challenges related to increased workload. Based on interviewers' perceptions, emerging themes were categorized as technostress creators or inhibitors. The findings highlight a dual impact of EHRs: while participants acknowledged improvements in patient safety and information access, they also expressed concerns about increased workload, technostress, and potential disruptions to team dynamics. This study identified two major themes: "EHR Adoption as a Double-Edged Sword" and "EHRs' Influence on Professional Dynamics". These findings underscore the need for organizational readiness and staff support to mitigate the negative impacts of EHRs on healthcare workers' well-being and job satisfaction.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
‘Trying to find information is like hating yourself every day’: The collision of electronic information systems in transition with patients in transition

Josephine McMurray,Elisabeth Hicks,Helen Johnson,Jacobi Elliott,Kerry Byrne,Paul Stolee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458212467547

2013-08-26

Health Informatics Journal

Abstract:The consequences of parallel paper and electronic medical records (EMR) and their impact on informational continuity are examined. An interdisciplinary team conducted a multi-site, ethnographic field study and retrospective documentation review from January 2010 to December 2010. Three case studies from the sample of older patients with hip fractures who were transitioning across care settings were selected for examination. Analysis of data from interviews with care providers in each setting, field observation notes, and reviews of medical records yielded two themes. First, the lack of interoperability between electronic information systems has complicated, not eased providers’ ability to communicate with others. Second, rather than transforming the system, digital records have sustained health care’s ‘culture of documentation’. While some information is more accessible and communications streamlined, parallel paper and electronic systems have added to front line providers’ burden, not lessened it. Implementation of truly interoperable electronic health information systems need to be expedited to improve care continuity for patients with complex health-care needs, such as older patients with hip fractures.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Electronic Health Record Usability, Satisfaction, and Burnout for Family Physicians

A. Jay Holmgren,Nathaniel Hendrix,Natalya Maisel,Jordan Everson,Andrew Bazemore,Lisa Rotenstein,Robert L. Phillips,Julia Adler-Milstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26956

2024-09-01

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This survey study measures physician satisfaction with their electronic health record and its usability and evaluates the association of electronic health record usability with satisfaction and burnout, as well as the moderating association of electronic health record efficiency strategies.

medicine, general & internal

Controlled limb reperfusion in patients with severe limb ischemia.

Clinician and staff experiences with frustrated patients during an electronic health record transition: a qualitative case study

Aicardi Syndrome.

Adjusting for differential proportions of second‐line treatment in cancer clinical trials. Part II: An application in a clinical trial of unresectable non‐small‐cell lung cancer

"Like One Long Battle:" Employee Perspectives of the Simultaneous Impact of COVID-19 and an Electronic Health Record Transition

From "Local Control" to "Dependency": Transitions to Single-Vendor Integrated Electronic Health Record Systems and Their Implications for the EHR Workforce

SBS 0846+513: a new γ-ray-emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy

Insulin receptor-like tyrosine kinase in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta.

The rates and sites of absorption of 131 I-labelled albumin and sodium 131 I in the rat.

Frontline Perspectives on Physician Burnout and Strategies to Improve Well-Being: Interviews with Physicians and Health System Leaders

Prospective Evaluation of a Closed-Loop, Computerized Reminder System for Pneumococcal Vaccination in the Emergency Department

Evaluating the Prevalence of Burnout Among Health Care Professionals Related to Electronic Health Record Use: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

"Anxiety, COVID, Burnout and Now Depression": a Qualitative Study of Primary Care Clinicians' Perceptions of Burnout

Variation in Family Physicians' Experiences Across Different Electronic Health Record Platforms: a Descriptive Study

Disrupted and Restored Patient Experience with Transition to New Electronic Health Record System.

Training physicians and residents for the use of Electronic Health Records-A comparative case study between two hospitals

Strategizing EHR use to achieve patient-centered care in exam rooms: a qualitative study on primary care providers

Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study

A Qualitative Study of Well-Being and Workplace Stress

‘Trying to find information is like hating yourself every day’: The collision of electronic information systems in transition with patients in transition

Electronic Health Record Usability, Satisfaction, and Burnout for Family Physicians