Abstract:As knowledge about chemical impacts on health and ecosystems continues to increase, so will pressures to avoid certain chemicals and chemical processes. Identifying and adopting alternatives to chemicals of concern is not straightforward. As such, there are a growing number of efforts by scientists, policymakers and others to improve chemical alternatives assessment (CAA) approaches, processes for identifying, comparing and selecting safer alternatives to chemicals of concern. Two main drivers in these assessments are to identify safer chemical alternatives and avoid situations where a substituted chemical is found to be unsuitable (i.e., “regrettable substitutions”). It is important that entities demanding, selecting, or adopting alternatives to chemicals of concern have adequate processes and a knowledge base to ensure thoughtful consideration of the choices. The foundational elements needed to make more informed chemical substitution choices were recently considered by a U.S. National Research Council (NRC) Committee charged with developing a Framework to Guide the Selection of Chemical Alternatives. A number of key steps may improve CAA as a science-policy discipline, similar to how the NRC “red book” on risk assessment elevated that field: (1) Alternatives assessment should be increasingly embraced and conducted in chemical selection. The goal of alternatives assessment is to inform substitution actions. It is different from a risk assessment or safety assessment, where the goal is to identify a safe level of exposure or characterize the risk associated with a given level of exposure. A number of CAA frameworks exist and while there are significant similarities between them, there are also important differences, including how uncertainties, exposures, and impacts across different life cycle stages are addressed. Gaps and differences in methods will need to be addressed; yet, it is critical that CAA processes be flexible so they can be adapted to varied decision contexts and avoid “paralysis by analysis”. Some may argue that the flexibility in alternatives assessment may not ensure consistency in CAA results across firms or agencies. However, while consistency is a laudable goal, it is rarely achievable, even for existing tools such as risk assessment. Flexibility in the alternatives assessment process provides an opportunity for adaptable evaluation−while ensuring that at least comprehensive thinking and assessment of potential trade-offs occurs. (2) CAAs would benef it f rom research and development ef forts that support the incorporation of novel data streams (e.g., high throughput in vitro assays and in silico approaches). Existing CAA frameworks predominantly rely on traditional toxicology data streams to assess the human health and environmental hazards of chemical use. While useful, this approach does not take advantage of the many developments in toxicity testing that have occurred over the past decade. Given the paucity of data, which can slow down CAAs, it is important that future CAA frameworks incorporate the use of in vitro and other high-throughput assays, toxicity pathway-centric assays, into the assessment process to address gaps in traditional knowledge. Similarly, it is important that emerging developments in toxicity testing be able to support the evaluation, comparison (including hazard categorization) and design of safer chemicals and materials, not simply to obtain more refined risk estimates. As science has advanced in this area, there are immediate opportunities to fill data gaps or screen for potential unexpected consequences using novel approaches. For example, assay results obtained in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, could simultaneously help predict toxicity to people and the soil compartment in ecotoxicity assessments. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) data could, with additional focused research, provide a useful substitute for the longer fish ecotoxicity reproduction studies traditionally conducted with other fish species. Future research efforts are needed to develop principles or tools that support the benchmarking, integration, and hazard categorization of high throughput data on chemical effects, especially

Answering the call for improved chemical alternatives assessments (CAA).

30 M 64-QAM Multicarrier Photonic-Wireless Communication Link in the 300 GHz Band

Non‐Hermitian Loss‐driven Broadband Low‐Loss On‐chip Terahertz Photonic SPDT Switch

Polarization Multiplexing Multichannel High-Q Terahertz Sensing System

Topological THz On-Chip Valley-Spin Converter

Terahertz topological photonics for on-chip communication

Terahertz Hybrid Topological Chip for 10-Gbps Full-Duplex Communications

Asymmetric Topological Valley Edge States on Silicon‐On‐Insulator Platform

Design of High-Isolation Topological Duplexer Utilizing Dual-Edge State Topological Waveguides

On‐Chip Polarization‐ and Frequency‐Division Demultiplexing for Multidimensional Terahertz Communication

A Unified System with Integrated Generation of High-Speed Communication and High-Resolution Sensing Signals Based on THz Photonics

150 Gbps THz Chipscale Topological Photonic Diplexer

Ultrafast Modulation of Terahertz Waves Using On-Chip Dual-Layer Near-Field Coupling

Electrical tunable topological valley photonic crystals for on-chip optical communications in the telecom band

Planar Terahertz Photonics Mediated by Liquid Crystal Polymers

Direct Observation of Terahertz Topological Valley Transport.

High-precision digital terahertz phase manipulation within a multichannel field perturbation coding chip

Harnessing Anti‐Parity‐Time Phase Transition in Coupled Topological Photonic Valley Waveguides

A Modularized and Switchable Component for Flexible Passive Device: Terahertz Photonic Crystals with Fine‐Tuning

Photon‐Induced Ultrafast Multitemporal Programming of Terahertz Metadevices

Multi-channel frequency router based on valley-Hall metacrystals