Rare Genetic Variants in Young Adults Requiring Pacemaker Implantation

Juan Pablo Ochoa,Maria Ángeles Espinosa,Jara Gayan-Ordas,Andrea Fernández-Valledor,María Gallego-Delgado,Coloma Tirón,Adrián Lozano-Ibañez,José Manuel García-Pinilla,José F Rodríguez-Palomares,José María Larrañaga-Moreira,Helena Llamas-Gómez,Tomas Ripoll-Vera,Aitana Braza-Boïls,Silvia Vilches,Irene Méndez,Ramón Bascompte-Claret,Ana García-Álvarez,Eduardo Villacorta,Ignacio Fernandez-Lozano,Enrique Lara-Pezzi,Pablo Garcia-Pavia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.008
Abstract:Background: Genetic disease has recently emerged as a cause of cardiac conduction disorders (CCDs), but the diagnostic yield of genetic testing and the contribution of the different genes to CCD is still unsettled. Objectives: This study sought to determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in young adults with CCD of unknown etiology requiring pacemaker implantation. We also studied the prevalence of rare protein-altering variants across individual genes and functional gene groups. Methods: We performed whole exome sequencing in 150 patients with CCD of unknown etiology who had permanent pacemaker implanted at age ≤60 years at 14 Spanish hospitals. Prevalence of rare protein-altering variants in patients with CCD was compared with a reference population of 115,522 individuals from gnomAD database (control subjects). Results: Among 39 prioritized genes, patients with CCD had more rare protein-altering variants than control subjects (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.75-3.33). Significant enrichment of rare variants in patients with CCD was observed in all functional gene groups except in the desmosomal genes group. Rare variants in the nuclear envelope genes group exhibited the strongest association with CCD (OR: 6.77; 95% CI: 3.71-13.87). Of note, rare variants in sarcomeric genes were also enriched (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.05-3.10). An actionable genetic variant was detected in 21 patients (14%), with LMNA being the most frequently involved gene (4.6%). Conclusions: Unrecognized rare genetic variants increase the risk of CCD in young adults with CCD of unknown etiology. Genetic testing should be performed in patients age ≤60 years with CCD of unknown etiology. The role of genetic variants in sarcomeric genes as a cause of CCD should be further investigated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?