Ōmori Shōzō and Kotodama Theory: How Can We Overcome the Need for Bodily Encounters?
Maki Sato
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jjp.2023.a913632
2023-12-01
Journal of Japanese Philosophy
Abstract:In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Ōmori Shōzō and Kotodama Theory: How Can We Overcome the Need for Bodily Encounters? Maki Sato Introduction Ōmori Shōzō is known for his theory of tachi-araware monism. Tachiaraware monism is his attempted counter-argument to the Cartesian dualism of the object–subject divide, or in his words, a divide between physical ( butsuri , mono , science, object) and non-physical consciousness ( ishiki , koto , perception, incident), perception ( chikaku , 知覚) and conception ( shikō , 思考). His concept of Kasane-egaki is also often cited as a core concept of his theory of time. 1 The main aim of this paper is to first overview the works of Ōmori since there is only a limited amount of his translated work so far. 2 Consecutively, the paper focuses on Ōmori's theory of kotodama and its related arguments with an intention to expand his concept of Kowaburi into the ethics of online encounters during the pandemic. The world in 2020 was suddenly forced to face the pandemic caused by COVID-19. What COVID-19 alerted us to is tremendous, and there are countless problems that the invisible virus has revealed. Among those are the hidden problems of contemporary society, not limited to the discrimination among races, gender, and jobs (white-collars versus essential workers), the problem of zoonosis, and the related environmental problems (climate change and intrusion into wild nature) caused by over-exploitation of nature. In developed countries, most students and those serving as intellectual workers face their daily lives being overly occupied with online lectures and meetings. COVID-19 worked to normalize remote work, which further normalized and forced our everyday life to shift to cyberspace. [End Page 101] In introducing and overviewing Ōmori's philosophy, this paper attempts to see the current situation through Ōmori's philosophy to draw out some ethical implications related to non-physical online encounters and how we can perceive human interactions and relationships under such conditions. Under the constraints caused by COVID-19, humans' limitless desires to interact with others are expanding more so to the sphere of cyberspace, leading to technological development, such as VR. In short, first, the paper overviews Ōmori's philosophy. Second, through the overview of Ōmori's philosophy, the paper seeks adaptable philosophy of his that may work as soft binding grounding ethics for cyberspace encounters where substantial bodily encounters are void. In doing so, the paper intends to draw out weak binding ethics implied in Ōmori's philosophy that may work to empathetically engage with others in cyberspace where embodied encounters with others are dissolved. Ōmori Shōzō and His Philosophy: A Short Introduction and Overview In his short essay introducing the Japanese philosophy of the 1970s, Yasuo Kobayashi coined the term "Komaba quartet" by selecting four active eminent philosophers based on the Komaba campus at the University of Tokyo. 3 Among them is Ōmori Shōzō (1921–97), aligning with Hiromatsu Wataru (1933–94), Sakabe Megumi (1936–2009), and Inoue Tadashi (1926–2014). Ōmori is the oldest of the Komaba quartet and received higher education before World War II. He served at the Naval Technology Institute Mitaka Laboratory during the war with his physics degree from the Tokyo Imperial University. 4 After the war, he studied philosophy at the University of Tokyo with an interest in phenomenology, leading him to study at Harvard and Stanford in the United States. During his professorship at the University of Tokyo, he inspired countless students who are now leading the philosophy academy in Japan, such as Noe Keiichi (1949–) and Noya Shigeki (1954–). In the round-table discussion titled "Explanatory Round-Table on the Charm of Ōmori's Philosophy," four of his former students—Iida Takashi and Tanji Nobuharu, in addition to Noe and Noya—worked on selecting his works. It is impressive to read that all four [End Page 102] of them recall how exciting and inspiring it was to take his classes. 5 Iida recalls that Ōmori's classes were exceptional since philosophy courses were all about reading, with might and main, the texts written in a language other than Japanese at the University of Tokyo. However, Ōmori, with his postwar American education, welcomed discussion with the students and was keen on questioning...