Abstract:Introduction: This study introduces and compares a new intraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy method to reach the level of the renal vein, the "tent-pitching" antegrade approach with the retrograde approach in gynecological malignancy surgeries in terms of success rate, complication incidence, and the number of lymph nodes removed. It focuses on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness. Meanwhile, this article reports on the vascular anatomical variations discovered in the para-aortic region to enhance surgical safety. Material and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients undergone laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy at a single center from January 2020 to December 2023 for high-risk endometrial and early-stage ovarian cancer. Patient charts were reviewed for mode of operation, perioperative complications, operative details, and histopathology. The patients were divided into anterograde group and retrograde group according to the operation mode. The two groups were further compared based on the success rate of lymph node clearance at the renal vein level, perioperative complications, and the number of removed lymph nodes. Quantitative data were analyzed using the t-test, non-normally distributed data using the rank-sum test, and categorical data using Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test, with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: Among 173 patients, the antegrade group showed higher surgery success (97.5% vs 68.82%), more lymph nodes removed (median 14 vs 7), and less median blood loss. The operation time was shorter in the antegrade group. Postoperative complications like lymphocele and venous thrombosis were lower in the antegrade group. Vascular abnormalities were found in 28.9% of patients, with accessory lumbar vein routing anomaly and accessory renal arteries being most common. Conclusions: The antegrade approach is feasible, safe, and effective, improving surgical exposure, reducing difficulty without additional instruments or puncture sites, and minimizing organ damage risk. It is effective in achieving better access to the renal vein and removing more para-aortic lymph nodes than the retrograde method. Recognizing and carefully managing the diverse vascular abnormalities in the para-aortic area, including variations in renal arteries, veins, and the inferior vena cava, is essential to reduce intraoperative bleeding and the likelihood of converting to open surgery.

Para-aortic lymph node dissection with or without nerve-sparing in gynecological malignancies

Can Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Ultra-Radical Hysterectomy Play a Role in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer? A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Improvements and challenges in intraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: The novel "tent-pitching" antegrade approach and vascular anatomical variations in the para-aortic region

Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Node-Negative Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Laparoscopic Local Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy: Description of a Novel Technique.

Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node dissection in colorectal cancer patients suspected of para-aortic lymph node metastasis: A retrospective cohort study

Prognostic Impact of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Resected Non-Pancreatic Periampullary Cancers

Intraoperative Frozen Pathology Exam of Common Iliac Lymph Nodes and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy on the Prognosis and Quality of Life for Patients with IB2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Trial Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (C-PACC Trial).

Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients

[Open Nerve-Plane Sparing Radical Hysterectomy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Evaluation on Efficacy and Long-Term Survival Outcomes].

The Feasibility and Technical Strategy of a Fascia Space Priority Approach in Laparoscopic Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Retrospective Multicentre Study

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-Low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicentre Lateral Node Study in China.

Para-aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Colorectal Cancer: Predicting Pathologic Lymph Node Positivity and Optimizing Outcomes

Should a Standard Lymphadenectomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy Exclude Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes for All Cases of Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer? A Consensus Statement by the Chinese Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (CSPAC).

Short‐term and Long‐term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle‐low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Lateral Node Study in China

A cohort study evaluating paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

Para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node metastasis

Comparison of survival outcomes with or without Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer in China from 2004 to 2016

Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical cancer: diagnostic accuracy and impact on clinical decision making

Reappraise Role of No. 10 Lymphadenectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer in the Era of Minimal Invasive Surgery During Total Gastrectomy: a Pooled Analysis of 4 Prospective Trial

Efficacy and safety evaluation of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy combined with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer