Thickened photoreceptor outer segment layer in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia

Wenli Zhang,Fan Yang,Shirong Chen,Tingkun Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3068_23
2024-07-11
Abstract:Purpose: To quantitatively investigate the reflectivity and structure of the outer retinal layers in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia by using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Methods: Seventy-eight patients with amblyopia and 64 age-matched children with normal vision were included in this study. All participants underwent SS-OCT and detailed ophthalmic examinations. Longitudinal reflectance profile measurements were measured using Image J. The reflectivity of outer retinal layers was measured at the three selected positions: subfovea, 1 mm nasal to the fovea, and 1 mm temporal to the fovea. The reflectivity ratios were calculated by outer retinal layers divided by the nuclear layer (ONL) for normalization. Photoreceptor outer segment layer thickness was also measured. The results were compared between the amblyopia and normal controls. The possible effects of age, sex, and axial length on results were adjusted by generalized estimating equations. Results: Photoreceptor outer segment layer thickness was significantly greater in amblyopic eyes than in normal control eyes at all three regions (18.41 ± 1.83 vs. 16.84 ± 1.39, P < 0.001 at the fovea; 14.78 ± 1.34 vs. 14.19 ± 1.40, P = 0.030 at 1 mm nasal to the foveal; 14.92 ± 1.48 vs. 14.41 ± 1.32, P = 0.049 at 1 mm temporal to the fovea). The reflectivity ratio of outer segment/ONL was higher only at 1 mm nasal to the fovea (2.94 ± 0.61 vs. 2.70 ± 0.42, P = 0.02). Subfoveal OS thickness was positively correlated with choroidal thickness (r = 0.248, P = 0.018) but was not correlated with spherical equivalent, age, axial length, or logMAR visual acuity. Conclusion: Quantitative measurement of SS-OCT images revealed greater photoreceptor outer segments in both eyes of children with amblyopia than in normal control eyes. A thicker OS thickness is somehow related to amblyopia, and this may be a new useful diagnostic parameter for amblyopia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?