Importance of lumbar instability in the study of associations between muscle morphology, pain, and disability in chronic low back pain

Tahere Seyedhoseinpoor,Mehdi Dadgoo,Mohammad Taghipour,Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani,Mohammad Ali Sanjari,Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002529
2024-07-08
Abstract:Objective: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the relationship between lumbar extensor muscle morphology, with pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and (2) compare these relationships in subgroup of CLBP with and without lumbar structural segmental instability. Design and methods: This cross-sectional study included 183 patients with CLBP. Standing lateral lumbar flexion/extension radiographs were used to assess lumbar structural segmental instability. Lumbar multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), and psoas major (PM) morphology were determined from axial magnetic resonance imaging. Associations between lumbar muscle morphologies and patient pain and disability were evaluated in two groups with and without lumbar instability. Results: Patients' disability was negatively associated with PM total cross-sectional area (beta = -22.82, 95%CI = -37.05 to -8.59) and functional cross-sectional area (beta = -23.45, 95%CI = -37.81 to -9.09). MF morphology was negatively associated with disability in the lumbar instability group. Pain intensity was only associated to PM total cross-sectional area (Beta = -3.33, 95%CI = -6.43 to -2.24) and functional cross-sectional area (Beta = -3.22, 95%CI = -6.40 to -0.05) only in the lumbar instability group. Conclusion: PM atrophy was associated with greater disability and pain in CLBP, but MF atrophy was associated with greater disability in CLBP patients with lumbar structural segmental instability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?