Abstract:Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have demonstrated the ability to pass standardized exams. These models are not trained for a specific task, but instead trained to predict sequences of text from large corpora of documents sourced from the internet. It has been shown that even models trained on this general task can pass exams in a variety of domain-specific fields, including the United States Medical Licensing Examination. We asked if large language models would perform as well on a much narrower subdomain tests designed for medical specialists. Furthermore, we wanted to better understand how progressive generations of GPT (generative pre-trained transformer) models may be evolving in the completeness and sophistication of their responses even while generational training remains general. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two versions of GPT (GPT 3 and 4) on their ability to pass the certification exam given to physicians to work as osteoporosis specialists and become a certified clinical densitometrists. The CCD exam has a possible score range of 150 to 400. To pass, you need a score of 300. Methods: A 100-question multiple-choice practice exam was obtained from a 3rd party exam preparation website that mimics the accredited certification tests given by the ISCD (International Society for Clinical Densitometry). The exam was administered to two versions of GPT, the free version (GPT Playground) and ChatGPT+, which are based on GPT-3 and GPT-4, respectively (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA). The systems were prompted with the exam questions verbatim. If the response was purely textual and did not specify which of the multiple-choice answers to select, the authors matched the text to the closest answer. Each exam was graded and an estimated ISCD score was provided from the exam website. In addition, each response was evaluated by a rheumatologist CCD and ranked for accuracy using a 5-level scale. The two GPT versions were compared in terms of response accuracy and length. Results: The average response length was 11.6 ±19 words for GPT-3 and 50.0±43.6 words for GPT-4. GPT-3 answered 62 questions correctly resulting in a failing ISCD score of 289. However, GPT-4 answered 82 questions correctly with a passing score of 342. GPT-3 scored highest on the "Overview of Low Bone Mass and Osteoporosis" category (72 % correct) while GPT-4 scored well above 80 % accuracy on all categories except "Imaging Technology in Bone Health" (65 % correct). Regarding subjective accuracy, GPT-3 answered 23 questions with nonsensical or totally wrong responses while GPT-4 had no responses in that category. Conclusion: If this had been an actual certification exam, GPT-4 would now have a CCD suffix to its name even after being trained using general internet knowledge. Clearly, more goes into physician training than can be captured in this exam. However, GPT algorithms may prove to be valuable physician aids in the diagnoses and monitoring of osteoporosis and other diseases.

What is the most effective management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction?

Evaluation of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for supporting real-world information needs in healthcare delivery

Comparative Analysis of GPT-4Vision, GPT-4 and Open Source LLMs in Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy: A Benchmark Against Human Expertise

Performance of Progressive Generations of GPT on an Exam Designed for Certifying Physicians as Certified Clinical Densitometrists

Exploring the potential utility of AI large language models for medical ethics: an expert panel evaluation of GPT-4

How well it works: Benchmarking performance of GPT models on medical natural language processing tasks

Evaluation of the safety, accuracy, and helpfulness of the GPT-4.0 Large Language Model in neurosurgery

Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems

O87: Stratified Evaluation of Large Language Model GPT-4’s Question-Answering In Surgery reveals AI Knowledge Gaps

GPT-4 can pass the Korean National Licensing Examination for Korean Medicine Doctors

P717 Evaluating the performance of Large Language Models in responding to patients' health queries: A comparative analysis with medical experts

Performance of Advanced Large Language Models (GPT-4o, GPT-4, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude 3 Opus) on Japanese Medical Licensing Examination: A Comparative Study

Determinants of exercise-induced changes in mitral regurgitation in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

Assessing Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT) in Clinical Decision-Making: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Large language models encode medical oncology knowledge: Performance on the ASCO and ESMO examination questions.

Evaluating capabilities of large language models: Performance of GPT-4 on surgical knowledge assessments

Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in Medical Licensing Examinations Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Satisfaction with child care arrangements: effects on adaptation to parenthood.

Large Language Model in Medical Information Extraction from Titles and Abstracts with Prompt Engineering Strategies: A Comparative Study of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Evaluating the use of large language models to provide clinical recommendations in the Emergency Department

Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study