Bereitschaftspotential of Pianists a

R. Kristeva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23570.x

IF: 6.499

1984-06-01

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract:Kornhuber and Deecke (1965) first described a slowly increasing surface negative potential which starts about 800 ms before movement onset and was termed “Bereitschaftspotential” (BP). The BP had a widespread bilateral distribution over precental and parietal regions with a maximum at the vertex. In a series of studies it was shown that the BP amplitude was influenced by psychological and physical parameters of the movement. The psychological parameters of the movement included motivation (McAdam and Seals, 1969), attention, and intentional involvement of the subject (Kornhuber and Deecke, 1965). The physical parameters of the movement included speed (Becker et al.. 1976; Hazemann et al., 1978). force (Kutas and Donchin, 1974; Wilke and Lansing, 1973; Becker and Kristeva, 1980) and bilaterality of the movement (Shibasaki and Kato, 1975; Kristeva et al., 1979). All of these studies used a self-paced simple movement. There have been only two studies on the BP prior to a skilled motor task (Taylor, 1978; Papakostopoulos, 1980). While the components of the skilled motor tasks used by these authors were familiar, the sequence required was unfamiliar to the subjects and was acquired during the experiment. To our knowledge, there is no published account for the BP prior to a well-learned complex sequence of skilled motor movements. A good example of such a task is the finger movement of a piano player. Most probably these movements do not rely on sensory feedback since “there is no time to correct errors’’ (Cooper, 1980). These movements are therefore preprogrammed. The BP prior to such movements requiring a complex motor program would be expected to have a large amplitude and would start early. We studied movements of a pianist playing the piano. Two situations-playing a single note and playing a melody-were compared.